Talk:Scentura

quote from lawsuit judgement

I moved this from the main page to talk:

The court ruled:

Whether they are characterized as a sale of merchandise or delivery on consignment, both the language of the agreement and the parties' actions based on the agreement, as indicated in the testimony at the arbitration hearing, clearly establish that defendant was compensated by [Scentura] for referring other persons into the perfume sales business.

I don't see how this is so important as to be added to the article. Maybe if it was worked into the paragraph itself instead? Calendar2 (talk) 15:28, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

It's relavent because this is the definition of a pyrmid sales scheme. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:41, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Scentura Salespeople

In this article, it looks like the term "Indepedent salespeople" is used about half the time, and "Scentura's salespeople" the other half.

Seems like any instance of "Scentura salespeople" should be changed to "Independent salespeople." The BBB report on Scentura shows that the company has 9 employees, and states "Scentura Creations only sells products to independent distributors." That, plus most of the references state that the sales people are all Independent.

Thoughts?

76.90.17.202 (talk) 04:38, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Whether the sales people are independent or not lies at the heart of the controversy here. "Independent salespeople" is absolutely the wrong term for them. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:50, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Would it be possible to refer to them simply as "salespeople" without any modification? 69.42.17.116 (talk) 23:54, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

News Article

Here's a news article about Scentura: http://www.scenturacreations.com/images/atlanta-business-chronicle-10-5-1987.pdf Is this helpful at all? 76.90.17.202 (talk) 22:44, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

yes, thank you, the original "Who wants to be rich". We have information on this already, but it is great to have the original. Calendar2 (talk) 01:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Scentura. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.icflorida.com/partners/wftv/consumer/2001/job_scam0211.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wftv.com/news/3556228/detail.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.collegian.psu.edu/archive/1991/10/10-22-91tdc/10-22-91dnews-09.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

another recent article on the company

• February 23, 2017, Upstate company posts salaried job ads, but isn’t hiring for real positions say fmr. employees. [1]

Website gone?

Website appears to be offline, possibly due to domain expiration, as of a few minutes ago. --Shawn K. Quinn (talk) 23:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)