Talk:Shadow (Final Fantasy)

Shadow (Final Fantasy) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 23, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Video games: Characters Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Video game characters task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Atomas (1 participant)
PLAY: The Games Festival (2 participants)
FloodSim (1 participant)
Kunimitsu and Kunimitsu II (1 participant)
Blast Monkeys (2 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (6 participants)
Free Internet Chess Server (9 participants)
Gilman Louie (3 participants; relisted)
Yoshimitsu (5 participants; relisted)
Emote (3 participants; relisted)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Donkey Kong (nom)

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Sun Haven

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Square Enix Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Square Enix, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Square Enix-related merchandise and video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Square EnixWikipedia:WikiProject Square EnixTemplate:WikiProject Square EnixSquare Enix articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Shadow (Final Fantasy)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs) 07:23, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 20:23, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will take this one on within the coming days. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 20:23, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Six GA Criteria

1. Article is well-written. Very minimal mistakes if any at all.

2. No OR, all info is cited in the article.

3. Coverage is broad in depth and focus. Shows multiple aspects of the character.

4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.

5. Article appears stable. Does not appear to have had any major vandalism occur.

6. Article uses one fair use image with proper rationale, and uses one music file with proper rationale.

Lead

-Looks good

Appearances

-"A distant and standoffish person, in the first half of the game he is an optional party can be hired to help during certain moments of the game, though will leave shortly after." clarify here a little since the typos make it confusing

Fixed

-"will take an immediate liking to" I'd change to "takes"

Fixed.

-Clarify that the dog goes with Shadow, since the wording makes it confusing.

Fixed?

Conception and design

-Looks good

Critical reception

-Looks good

Overall

-Patched up some minor typos where they were easy to do, just patch up those things above and you should be good to go. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 00:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should be everything, let me know if anything else needs looking at!--Kung Fu Man (talk) 00:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]