Jump to content

Talk:Shamita Shetty

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

{{editprotected}} actress is repeated in the first paragraph. --Smremde (talk) 06:28, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Gimmetrow 06:38, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This same kind of vandalism is also taking place at Shilpa Shetty, though thankfully I'm keeping a watch on it. Ekantik talk 06:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That particular bit had been there for a while. Gimmetrow 07:11, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioning Caste

[edit]

Dear Editors!
There has been a discussion on India Portal related to mentioning of caste of subjects. The point is that mentioning caste of people, who have nothing to do with their caste, is found to be unnecessary by few editors. Hence the caste of the subject person needs to be deleted from the biography. I am not deleting the caste as of now but am only posting this here so that the regular editors of this article are well aware of it beforehand and no edit-wars take place. For details of discussion held on the portal please refer Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Mentioning_caste_of_Individuals. Your views if any are welcome there or even here.
And.... as the reasons of exclusion of caste pointed out were "irrelavant to notability of subject person", "privacy of the subject person", "inclusion of caste is like branding individuals", etc. other information included in the article which also fall under these cases will also be removed after discussions. Examples of it included religion, non-notable spouse's and children's and parents' information, previous occupation, lived in places, non-notability related educational qualification, etc.
Your views on this are also welcome here or at the India portal. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 13:30, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not here, please. There is a community discussion taking place at WT:INB and I would advise people to read the entire discussion before forming an opinion because the above summary is incorrect. Nothing more need be said here. - Sitush (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]