Jump to content

Talk:Shaw Neilson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Title should be John Shaw Nielson

[edit]

The title of this article is 'Shaw Neilson', it should be his full name 'John Shaw Neilson'.----Design (talk) 07:04, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why? He was known simply as "Shaw Neilson". We don't have "Edward Gough Whitlam" or "John Malcolm Fraser" or "James Earl Carter" or "George Walker Bush". -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 07:10, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
My answer is: writers may be known by their surnames (Wordsworth, Burns), but their article on Wikipedia is titled with their full name, with a redirect from their shorter name. Also he is known as John Shaw Neilson in published biographies and collections of his works for the last 50 years (refer to the bibliography in the article). His friends and family called him John or Jock. He initally used "Shaw Neilson" in the early 20th c to distinguish himself from his father, who had also had some verses published. ----Design (talk) 07:23, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
See also [National Library of Australia], and [Australian Dictionary of Biography].
... but their article on Wikipedia is titled with their full name, with a redirect from their shorter name. Please show me where this rule is specified. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 08:57, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biographies states "While the article title should generally be the name by which the subject is most commonly known, the subject's full name, if known, should be given in the lead sentence", so I think the issue here is that we do not currently have a consensus on Neilson's "most commonly known" name.----Design (talk) 03:13, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Of the poetry books published in his lifetime, some used "Shaw Neilson", some used "John Shaw Neilson". Of the biographies published since his death, the majority use "John Shaw Neilson".----Design (talk) 06:30, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm late to this discussion but I'd opt for "John Shaw Neilson". Austlit has him listed that way. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 06:18, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shaw Neilson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:40, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]