Jump to content

Talk:Siobhán O'Hanlon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Alleged

[edit]

"She was alleged to have participated in the attempted bombing of Gibraltar (see Operation Flavius and Death on the Rock [9]). She was alleged to have been one of four PIRA members, but only she survived, as the other three (including Mairéad Farrell) were shot and killed by the SAS before the bombing could be carried out."

Was O'Hanlon ever tried and convicted for being the '4th' member? If not, than it's just gossip from a tabloid newspaper and shouldn't be on wikipedia.Bcsurvivor 23:06, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Being processed through a criminal court isn't the only test of fact. Newly released MI5 photographs from Defence of the Realm shows Siobhan O'Hanlon in Gibraltar at the same time as the three IRA members who were shot dead by the SAS. Whilst there is insufficnet evidence to convict, the circumstantial evidence of Ms O'Hanlon being in Gibraltar concurrently with three of her Sinn Fein and IRA associates on a bombing mission is overwhelming. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.108.133.142 (talk) 08:18, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tidy Up

[edit]

Edits made to make diacritical words (Siobhán, Féin) consistent. More importantly, editor User:Bcsurvivor has a habit of repeating pronouns and names within the same paragraph or page when it is unneccessary and, in fact, distracting. Sometimes duplicate text or info. is also repeated. I am not carping or nit-picking. I tidied up the text and please do not change until specific changes are discussed. Hope Springs Eternal 00:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of worrying about 'tidying up' the article, why don't you produce the external verifying references for your allegations about O'Hanlon being the 4th member of the Gibraltar group? I'm not finished 'tidying up' the article myself.Bcsurvivor 01:56, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gibraltar accusations should be deleted

[edit]

It's obvious that even 'Hope Springs Eternal' doesn't believe that this person was involved with the Gibraltar incident so it shouldn't be on this person's wikipedia webpage unless wikipedia wants to defend itself against LIBEL charges.Bcsurvivor 02:16, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Having this tabloid Gibraltar accusation on this deceased woman's webpage is equivalent to having an accusation that she killed Princess Diana. It's absurd and hurts the credibility of wikipedia.Bcsurvivor 23:32, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutly - the allegations should be deleted. It even bloody well points out that she wasn't blonde and didn't have a baby at the time said.Irish Republican 05:47, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Siobhán O'Hanlon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]