Talk:Skipton

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Mid‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Skipton is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requires cleanup?

Article is currently reading as a list of attractions and amenities in and around the town, could do with a substantial clean-up to (a) make it scan better, and (b) tidy up and remove the more un-useful information? Scrxisi (talk) 20:45, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). --JD554 (talk) 06:19, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree that if you feel you can improve the article go ahead and take the plunge. Take it steady though so that others can see what you are changing, large unexplained changes tend to get reverted as vandalism. Keith D (talk) 14:10, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a go - fairly major re-organisation, hopefully making it a bit more consistent in the level of detail throughout (eg got rid of the names of individuals involved in twinning). I fully expect some of this to be reverted, no offense taken. TrulyBlue (talk) 20:15, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A vs An

If the h at the beginning of a word is pronounced (such as in historic) then the indefinite article is a. It should only be an if the h is silent. Please see [1]. --JD554 (talk) 08:26, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can find opinion on either side: for example, see this discussion on the Manual of Style (basically showing that you have a choice) and The Times Style and Usage Guide (which prescribes 'an historic' for The Times). Personally I find that in spoken English, "an istoric" trips of the tongue better than "a historic" (an n is easier to say than an h) and that's what I'd probably use. For a Yorkshire article in particular, 'appens "an 'istoric" is reet good English. TrulyBlue (talk) 09:28, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree they couldn't make a decision at the discussion you've cited, but that appears to be for trying to standardise all the use of a or an for all flavours of English. As this is an article about a British town, the article should use the correct British English, which leads on to the citation from the OED I've given above. As an aside (and a Yorkshireman) I'd disagree with your last statement, and would say "An 'istoric is reet good Yorksher." ;) --JD554 (talk) 10:29, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to add: The Guardian style guide (quite unsurpisingly) disagrees with The Times! --JD554 (talk) 10:32, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, should grammar books be descriptive of prescriptive? Try saying "an istoric" quickly five times, then "a historic" quickly five times. Anyway, some nameless Samaritan has saved the day by a drive-by edit avoiding the issue. Thank you, nameless editor! TrulyBlue (talk) 08:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Skipton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070304175546/http://politics.guardian.co.uk:80/person/parliament/0,,-2597,00.html to http://politics.guardian.co.uk/person/parliament/0,,-2597,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:04, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Skipton/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

References required (inline)
Copy-editing for WP:MOS
History section should have short summary of sub-article
Check out external links for relevance (including embedded links)

Keith D 13:28, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 21:38, 28 August 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 06:20, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Skipton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061014220616/http://skiptonlittletheatre.org.uk/index.html to http://www.skiptonlittletheatre.org.uk/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:10, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]