Talk:Star Wars: Battlefront

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Star Wars: Battlefront article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Star Wars: Battlefront" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Archives: 1

Video games Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Train simulator (disambiguation) (3 participants)
Preston Arsement (2 participants)
Jackpot World (1 participant)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

No did you know nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Star Wars Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Star Wars To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Tag the talk pages of Star Wars-related articles with the {{WikiProject Star Wars}} banner. Update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed Star Wars articles and Category:Unknown-importance Star Wars articles.
Citing sources : Jedi, Sith
Cleanup : Remove any In-universe information at Category:Star Wars articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction.
Copyedit : Under Early Life. Fix grammar of "towns (plural) predominantly Protestant technical college" to "town's (possessive)..."
Stubs : Category:Star Wars stubs
Other : * See the things to do page
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[List of Star Wars characters#Commander "Bacara" (CC-1138)|Commander Bacara]]
[[Clone trooper#Commander Cody|Commander Cody]] The anchor (#Commander Cody) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Star Wars: Battlefront IV

Am I the only one who thinks Unseen64 is an extremely unreliable source? I've taken a closer look at that "concept art" wearing the "Star Wars: Battlefront IV watermark" but I have to say, this could be concept art for any other game or movie, or fan made, and even more importantly: the watermark looks extremely fake. Take a look at the "IV" part and you'll notice that anyone who's half decent at any drawing program could have easily put that in. And I haven't even gone on about how illogical it would be for LucasArts to start working on IV if III isn't even HALF done. My question: can't we better delete the Star Wars: Battlefront IV part? It is misleading and merely based on a few strange "concept art" images posted on an unreliable website. --DaniellaGiovanna (talk) 20:35, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree with you, not only is the artwork unreliable. But with 3 being nothing more then a rumor. I do not feel like Lucas Arts would even begin to work on the 4th. --Jesus4u09 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.184.50.239 (talk) 23:09, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Free Radical was also working on battlefront 4 this is the source: http://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2014/02/12/fall-of-the-empire-how-inner-turmoil-brought-down-a-legendary-studio.aspx?PostPageIndex=4 in this website's source is from Rob Smith’s book, Rogue Leaders: A History of LucasArts — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.184.169.3 (talk) 14:53, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing the "Gameplay" heading

Under the "Gameplay" heading there is a repetitive, and confusing statement: "...The gameplay is similar to that found in the Battlefield series and related series. Games normally revolve..."

I would edit this myself, but I do not have a sufficient understanding of the mechanics of the Battlefront series to do so. --209.226.111.123 (talk) 02:31, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Star Wars: Battlefront which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 16:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars Battlefront III playable build leak worth mentioning?

Is there any merit to mentioning the coverage the SWBFIII XBox360 build leak of a couple of days back? I have a few sources here if it is:

http://kotaku.com/star-wars-battlefront-iii-prototype-apparently-leaks-1754127977 http://bgr.com/2016/01/21/star-wars-battlefront-3-prototype-leak/ https://www.vg247.com/2016/01/21/star-wars-battlefront-3-footage-emerges-from-apparent-leak/

I'm not sure if it counts as 'notable' enough, hence why I'm asking here first. Gistech (talk) 10:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]