This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
I added info that is essential to teh understanding of teh statue, contained in teh body. It was reverted with a lame "besides a typo I am not sure it adds info".
The typo was easily corrected and the info that Betjemann saved St Pancras from demolition in the 1960s, which I am sure adds information not as clearly contained in teh generic half sentence that follows ("Betjeman lifelong advocate of Victorian architecture) , added back in.
My addition was again reverted without going to talk. Come on , face the facts that the addition is clarifying andadding specifics and stop editwarring! Wuerzele (talk) 21:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:BRD, the onus was on you to start the discussion. And to ensure that your additions were error-free. The point is that you were repeating information already in the article. Nonetheless, I have attempted a re-wording to make the connection more explicit. Perhaps we can discuss rather than edit-war, if it doesn't meet your concern. KJP1 (talk) 06:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
