Talk:Still Life: An Allegory of the Vanities of Human Life

Still Life: An Allegory of the Vanities of Human Life has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 9, 2023	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 18, 2023.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Still Life: An Allegory of the Vanities of Human Life (pictured) includes a skull with missing teeth as a reminder of human mortality?

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Article title[edit]

Nice work. Suggest Allegory of the Vanities of Human Life as title. Re the references, it would be better to put the books into a separate "sources" sect, and to refer in the inline notes to the page nr (eg Harrison (2020), p. 121). Ceoil (talk) 19:14, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Would describe in the lead as a Memento mori. Ceoil (talk) 21:01, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ceoil Thanks for the help, I will add you to the DYK. Regarding the title - I think this is the most common and brings back the most results. I will give the title some more research. Bruxton (talk) 21:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bruxton, I was thinking more I'll review the DYK but my feeling is that while its coming along nicely, could do with another ce. Again, nice work. Ceoil (talk) 21:42, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reception[edit]

A section I always include when critique or reviews exist. I see how parts were deemed unnecessary so I have paired the section. I will also seek out other critiques. Bruxton (talk) 14:31, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]