From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Elements (Rated C-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is supported by WikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements and their isotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this article, or visit the project page for more details.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject Materials (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Materials, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Materials on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WikiProject icon
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team / Vital (Rated C-class)
WikiProject iconThis article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
Checklist icon
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Why is sulfur associated with volcanism?[edit]

The article did not answer my question: Why is sulfur associated with volcanism? It is a literally universal phenomenon, most notably on Jupiter's moon Io, so clearly there is something critical being left unmentioned in this article. I suspect it is a combination of the element's abundance, density, and melting points, but I'm not sure how that interplay works out. Badon (talk) 09:15, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Direct reactions between elemental sulfur and other elements[edit]

I have removed the following claim (formerly the last sentence of the opening paragraph):

Chemically, sulfur reacts with all elements except for gold, platinum, iridium, tellurium, and the noble gases.

The "except" portion directly contradicts the assertion in Wikipedia's own article on Iridium(III) sulfide, which specifically states that this compound can be "prepared by heating a mixture of elemental iridium and sulfur." An unfortunate complication: when I tried to find further documentation for this assertion, the reference I found described synthesis of a different compound, iridium disulfide [iridium(IV) sulfide], by direct reaction between the elements at atmospheric pressure. I have therefore created the new article Iridium(IV) sulfide Iridium disulfide, using that reference. The basic point still remains: iridium and sulfur do react directly, contrary to the "except" clause of the claim I have removed.

I would have preferred to correct, rather than simply remove, the false claim. Unfortunately, to make this possible, a correct statement about the exact extent of sulfur's reactivity with other elements will need to be found in a source; synthesizing this information ourselves, from multiple sources, would be WP:OR (specifically, WP:SYNTH).

Syrenka V (talk) 14:01, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Well said. I probably was the one who committed the crime of overstatement.--Smokefoot (talk) 14:04, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

"Sulvere" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]


An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sulvere. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)