Jump to content

Talk:Sycamore processor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Off-topic paragraph

[edit]

Is it necessary to talk about the other quantum processor advancements by independent groups not using Sycamore? I believe all of it should be moved to its own section if it is important contextual information (which I do not believe it is) or even removed entirely.

In particular, I am talking about this section:

In December 2020, the Chinese photon-based Jiuzhang processor, developed by USTC, achieved a processing power of 76 qubits, making it the second computer to attain quantum supremacy.[15]

--The Legend of iPhoenix (talk) 14:19, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

czesc

[edit]

czesc koledzy co sadzicie o tak fajnej rzeczy? 89.231.42.137 (talk) 03:22, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, just a friendly reminder that the purpose of a page's associated talk page is to provide space for editors to discuss editing that page. Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views on a subject. In future, please keep this in mind.
The following links will explain this further.
Help:Using talk pages Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia#Discussion and consensus
Data Devourer (talk) 01:58, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note about Google sycamore

[edit]

Student Form 3 102.176.65.148 (talk) 22:36, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]