Talk:Tales of Destiny

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Remake

I think the remake should eventually get its own page, as it is clearly a full on remake and will consist of many differences in comparison to the original.--Claude 00:58, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that would be fine as its own section. It looks like relatively extensive remake, I doubt it'll be so drastically different plotwise and so on (like ToP's SNES -> PS1 remake, but this will probably be a bit more different) --melodiester 02:26, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Wild Arms Alter Code: F has its own page apart from the original, but I'd be more willing to wait at this point to see just how different the ToD remake is from the PS1 version before deciding anything just yet. I'm sure it'll have a much more fleshed out story, and the battle system does look quite a bit different, but unless the remake's page has enough new info to stand on its own, it may end up just repeating the same information from the original article. Nall 06:07, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Lillith thing on the remake parts needs to be in ONE place and marked for spoilers/secrets.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Tales of Destiny. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:56, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]