Talk:Terrance and Phillip in Not Without My Anus

Terrance and Phillip in Not Without My Anus has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 28, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Animation: American / Television / Computer / South Park Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group.
	This article is supported by the South Park task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Animation / Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force.

Not without my daughter

hello,

how about including a reference to the book and movie "not without my daughter"? eg http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0102555/ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vinthund (talk • contribs) 01:26, 19 April 2006 (UTC). I don't really know the story of either that movie, nor have I watched this episode, but do you have any references? If not, it's just as likely that it's a reference to the Aardman short Not Without My Handbag, at least in the judgement of Wikipedia. 66.215.20.28 (talk) 06:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POV weasel-word assumption etc.

From the first paragraph: "This upset and enraged many viewers, who, in retrospect, believe "Not Without My Anus" to be the worst South Park episode ever;" Oh really? All the people I've talked to love it. Guess that should and will be tossed as any POV for or against without proper citation. -- Bobak 18:55, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not without my anus is my favourite episode —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.64.108.141 (talk • contribs) 10:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Some of us were infuriated and did not watch the show for a season or two. That viewpoint is valid too. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.166.233.101 (talk • contribs) 05:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC).[reply]

=Was all talk of fans being outraged removed from this article? Obviously not everyone hated it, it's one of my favorite episodes as well (I was pleasantly surprised to see this supposedly-banned episode air on Comedy Central a couple days ago.), but a lot of people were outraged by it when it first aired. It really is one of the more controversial episodes of South Park, and there needs to be some talk of it in this article. -extrafacelol —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.252.205.116 (talk • contribs) 17:57, 15 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Favorite?

btw when you said matt and tray said this was there favourite episode i think you are referring to the fireside chat thing (on the dvds i think) where they introduce every episode. They do however say at the beginning of every episode that its their favourite so i doubt this is really their favourite —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.43.149.154 (talk • contribs) 21:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Back on the air

I have news that this episode came back on the air yesterday, and it was the third episode to be back on the air since the real Saddam was hanged four months ago! The proof is in this link. --Angeldeb82 03:13, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cites please

One conversation between Scott and Saddam references Star Wars Episode V. When Scott asks why Saddam didn't keep to his side of the deal, Saddam reacts like Darth Vader does by saying: "I changed my mind, pray that I don't change it any further." Scott then reacts like Lando Calrissian by saying: "This deal is getting worse all the time."
While watching American television, Terrance and Phillip watch a bogus clip from Cartman's Mom is Still a Dirty Slut and laugh at the Americans' heads.
The Canadian football game is between the "Ottawa RoughRiders" and the "Vancouver RoughRiders." This is a reference to how the Canadian Football League once had two of its eight teams with essentially the same name, although the Ottawa Rough Riders spelled theirs as two words and folded after the 1996 season, and the Saskatchewan Roughriders play in Regina, not Vancouver, and do not capitalize the second R.
Terrance and Phillip enjoy Kraft Dinner (called Kraft Macaroni and Cheese Dinner in the U.S.), which is a very popular food in Canada, despite its American origins (they pronounce 'Kroff' like [kraf] instead of the American [kræft] in an attempt to imitate the stereotypical Canadian accent).
In the scene Terrence and Phillip learns that Celine Dion is pregnant to Ugly Bob's child, Phillip responds "Oh, the humanity!". This is a clear reference to Herbert Morrison's description of the Hindenburg disaster.
This episode was Rated PG by the BBFC which confused some fans due to South Parks' usual 15 or 12 rating.

Alastairward (talk) 14:44, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The spelling used in the episode is "Kroff Dinner." This can be seen in the brief shot of "Karl's Kroff Dinner Palace." Ntufnel (talk) 21:35, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No notability. Don't add them. Railer-man (talk) 23:31, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Terrance and Phillip in Not Without My Anus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CTJF83 chat 01:04, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Starting within 2 days CTJF83 chat 01:04, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, people seriously got that upset over a week delay?!....anyways...

There is no source saying it is rarely seen episode, only that it wasn't shown between original airdate, and VHS release
Link 17 (apparently spam because I can't link to it) is dead
I also prefer link 1 not be in the lead, but in the body or infobox
I'm also a stickler on alt text to images
The home video release section is short, up to you, but consider moving it to a subsection of production or reception.

CTJF83 chat 02:25, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Much of that is done. Take a look! Railer-man (talk) 20:34, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Still need alt text, and either a source, or a removal saying it is rarely seen as the current source says it was never seen between the original airdate and the VHS release. CTJF83 chat 20:54, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't really know what alt text is, but I'll try. Railer-man (talk) 21:29, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Pass Alt text (and everything else) looks good, passing. CTJF83 chat 04:58, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

this aired on the exact same day i was born — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.72.165.15 (talk) 19:02, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Creators' favorite episode"

Didn't the creators say that about pretty much every episode they've made, especially in the first couple of seasons? It seems to be a fairly meaningless claim unless this qualification is mentioned somehow 132.206.55.197 (talk) 16:46, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

^agreed. Stating bluntly that this episode is Parker & Stone's favorite is not accurate as they say the same of many others, and is in any case redundant because it is repeated in a later paragraph with the more accurate, they "have said" it is their fav. It's prob best to just take it out altogether but at least revise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.23.183.231 (talk) 09:53, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]