Talk:List of Annoying Orange episodes

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of Annoying Orange episodes article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 November 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: American / Television Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Animation / Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

YouTube Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject YouTube To-do:

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see list.
Assess : Apply the assessment scale on Unknown-importance YouTube articles + Unassessed YouTube articles
Cleanup : See cleanup listing
Maintain : This WikiProject
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class YouTube articles
Other :
- Substitute {{WikiProject YouTube/Invite Members}} on user talk pages
- Check out edit requests on Talk:List of YouTubers

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by BDD, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 24 July 2012.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Text and/or other creative content from this version of List of Annoying Orange episodes was copied or moved into List of Annoying Orange episodes (seasons 1–9) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Pac-Man#Enemies|Blinky, Pinky, Inky, and Clyde]] The anchor (#Enemies) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Do not add your personal interpretations and analysis

Our policies require that any interpretations and analysis MUST be sourced to third party reliable sources and not based solely on Wikipedia editors opinions. The interpretation that Lady Pasta is Lady Gaga or a parody has been challenged many many times and the assertion cannot be added to the article without providing a third party source for the claim. See also WP:SYN. Active Banana ( ^bananaphone 14:19, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's all fine and dandy, but the episode's song by Lady Pasta is in the same rhythm and tune as "Bad Romance" (as said even in the epidoe captions) and she dresses like Lady Gaga did in the song. I'm all for others having different interpretations, but this one really sticks out. I'm not objecting to the WP rules, but it just seems a bit odd that in this case we need more third party sources. Wouldn't the captions work? Maybe if you watch the epidoe you'll see what I mean. --The Wing Dude, Musical Extraordinaire (talk) 22:09, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No. Unless it explicitly stated in the video, any interpretation or analysis must be sourced. Active Banana (^bananaphone 20:46, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Hey Apple?"

I don't think that this article should list the original episode as being called "Hey Apple." This video was never called this and it even has a title at the beginning that says "The Annoying Orange." I do agree that "Hey Apple" was a notable catchphrase of Orange in this episode, but it isn't and never was the name of it. I think that this should just be listed as "The Annoying Orange." —Preceding unsigned comment added by AutoMe (talk • contribs) 17:00, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's changed now. I also think it should stay this way!

Don't touch the sides! Butterfingers! (talk) 19:33, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Meh, just keep it named "Hey Apple". I like the title. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.243.23.219 (talk) 01:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CITE

Walex03 (talk) 20:29, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox

Why does navbox look so weard. I don't know how to fix it. Can you please fix it?--Caos2008lv (talk) 12:43, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK NOW ITS SERIOUS!

Where did Season 2 go? I tried to get it back, but couldn't. FIX IT! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.103.216.147 (talk) 17:18, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Season Overview of the Annoying Orange

I was having a little bit of trouble with the season overview. And now it's connected with the episode list. Can someone fix it? Here's the link: [[1]] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.194.31.203 (talk) 01:31, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Annoying Orange: Plumpkin

I looked up on the episode list of the Annoying Orange Season 1, but the episode "Annoying Orange: Plumpkin" was missing. Where did it go? --Sinatra1969 (talk) 13:40, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References!

Shouldn't we user the YouTube video URL as the reference of the episode. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 16:35, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

tthat is a primary source and acceptable for certain limited purposes, however, 3rd party sources are also required.Active Banana (^bananaphone 11:54, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Third party sources seem like something to get the list of episodes in order.

--''Walex03'' talk:<sup>(talk to me here!]]</sup> (talk) 14:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

link

since its a youtube series, would there be anything wrong with linking to the offical episodes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.34.25.91 (talk) 00:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

75.34.25.91,

You left that comment in December 2010. It is now January 2012. It has been about twelve months since you left that comment. Nobody has objected within the first fourteen days, or up until now no edits had been made to the section, so it is tolerable that links can be. However, we have a different objection for the section above, saying that references would be intolerable by WP:CITE. I like your thinking, but that does not go on the article.

--ObiwanLostToBarney (talk) 01:23, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Obi-wan, I don't think we would need references to add links. In that case, I shall make this edit now.

Walex03 (talk) 20:24, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Annoying Orange vs. Gecko

The episode features Orange annoying a gecko in a car insurance commercial. The title is "Annoying Orange vs. Gecko (Geico Spoof)". The description says "CARCO is not an actual car insurance company. This is a SPOOF of Geico." The announcer at the beginning is listed in the credits as "Geico Dude". Our final conclusion: It's not a Geico parody!

Seriously, the fact that it's a Geico parody should STAY. The guy who keeps removing it claims that there is no official source for it being a Geico parody, but in addition to the fact that Geico is mentioned in THREE DIFFERENT SPOTS, I am not aware of any other car insurance commercial that uses a gecko.

If anybody has any objection, please post them below, though you probably shouldn't have any. --216.15.119.93 (talk) 21:26, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in agreement with this, although I know why the person taking it down is doing it. It's because no source is provided for the fact. However, we can include the fact in the title becuase the "(GEICO Spoof)" is in the original title. I'm gonna do that now. --The Wing Dude, Musical Extraordinaire (talk) 22:51, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Said user took it down ANYWAT, after seeing that (Geico spoof) was in the title. --173.54.203.93 (talk) 23:42, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This IS a Geico parody

There really IS no difference between a spoof and a parody, as far as I am concerned. Daneboe also used the word "spoof" again. In the first Wazzup, it is entitled:

"Annoying Orange Wazzup".

The "Annoying Orange", was purely from the episode's entitlement alone. That was not from the "Annoying Orange-" which I believe first appeared in "Passion of the fruit.

I have links to all three episodes:

[m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=cOx49nX9dnw]

[m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=cL_qGMfbtAk]

[m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=InhbSdcNBZw]

Those were all mentioned.

I also think that links should be added to every episode.

I will go edit that myself.--ObiwanLostToBarney (talk) 21:55, 15 December 2011 (UTC) Well, actually I won't waste my life doing that but everyone can do 1. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ObiwanLostToBarney (talk • contribs) 02:05, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Annoying Orange Sitcome Version is Extended?

The Annoying Orange Sitcom Version is not an extended episode of the Annoying Valentine. Believe me I have checked. Just thought you'd like to know. -James Pandora Adams

Actually, it is, because it's longer than the original video. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.54.203.93 (talk) 02:45, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

This page needs reliable sources for season divisions and for production codes. If there cannot be any such reliable sources found, then the information cannot go on the page. --173.54.203.93 (talk) 07:15, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if this is a reliable source, but there are seasons on the episode guide of The Annoying Orange Wkia 68.37.41.158 (talk) 19:13, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A Wikia page is not a reliable source. --173.54.203.93 (talk) 03:25, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, NOW there's a source for season divisions. They decided to make it easier, apparently. So anyone who wants to put it up, go ahead. --173.54.203.93 (talk) 22:06, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just try YouTube. Just thought I'd let ya know.

Walex03 (talk) 20:24, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep it clean

Over the past weeks, I have noticed several anonymous users adding original research and writing content from their own point of view and not from a neutral point of view. Also, some anonymous users repeatedly revert my edits without explanation and without discussion here.

I would like this to cease and desist immediately. -- $Bryce Wilson | talk$ 04:30, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Purely disruptive editing

Most recently, I have noticed several IP addresses who may have intended to try helping out this article, but some have been editing disruptively. I know they may not be familiar with WP's policies and guidelines, and I have tried to talk out the matter with them, but they continued with disruption, totally ignored my help like it was a waste of my time. The disruption includes:

Removal of maintenance tags without explanation – 1, 2
Removal of my comments without explanation – 1

I did not list everything.

I know that everyone makes mistakes and that life is a theatre of learning. But making pointless edits to the article without explanation and for totally ignoring me, also an editor, and also trying not to compromise with me at all, is downright rude and depressing.

I am temperamental just like some people, and I think I do show some ownership of the article. But I can do nothing else but revert to the last good-faith reversion if the article keeps being injured like this.

Here are the IP's who are involved in making most of the disruptive edits:

68.195.37.107 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)
76.228.226.122 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)
65.51.138.98 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)

I do appreciate 216.15.119.93 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)'s improvements to the article; the user may have changed the meaning of episode descriptions (at times) but made all of their edits all in good faith.

The overall treatment the IP's have given to me is negative and hostile, and this needs to stop. I am pretty sure if the IP editors want to sort the matter out with me they can reply to this message or leave a note on my talk page.

I think if this won't stop whatsover, I'm done with helping out the article. It can be ruined by the editors daily. But the bad it does will make the article more confusing.

Best regards. $Bryce Wilson | talk$ 05:48, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have already issued a last warning to 76.228.226.122 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) per this edit. It clearly added content violating WP:NPOV and WP:OR and removed my comments again without warning. I asked the user to read this message on this talk page and to reply if they wished to, but he ignored my message and continued on with disruption. It will be a report if it happens again. --

Bryce Wilson | talk

05:03, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Annoying Super Mario"?

The episode is actually called, "Annoying Orange-Super Mario". However, just put "Super Mario", since in all the namings you took a way the "Annoying Orange-". --ObiwanLostToBarney (talk) 21:34, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CITE --Bryce (talk | contribs) 01:48, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For this one, I think it might be appropriate to cite references to the episode. Simple. Click the reference, then click the link. Then you'll see that the name is "Super Mario". I have to have more people agree.

--ObiwanLostToBarney (talk) 16:40, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wtf?

This article was perfect, until vandalizers had to go and screw it up. That "Paramount Shorts" section makes absolutely NO sense, comparing all the episodes to movies, and the coding in the last one is wrong. I will REMOVE that section unless anyone objects within the next 14 days. Please note this section, and respond if you have an objection to removal of this non-sensical garbage.

--ObiwanLostToBarney (talk) 01:11, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Last Entry

On the last entry the word him is written when it doesn't seem to need to be there. -James Pandora Adams — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.126.18.254 (talk) 17:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accuracy

I've noticed that somewhere around the first season the episodes were poorly lined up and not in order. Why? The explanation is simple: When the first season was beginning, annoying orange was not notable. Around the time when it started being notable, the beginning of the list was created, but sloppily in order. I am writing this on a Saturday, yesterday was Friday, and every Friday a new episode comes out. I shall make this clean-up edit now.

Walex03 (talk) 20:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will add a reliable source from YouTube.

Walex03 (talk) 20:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons

I think that this should be divided into seasons. 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012... It helps organize the page. I shall make this edit now.

Walex03 (talk) 20:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, I strongly advise you not to do so without a reliable source to support that "seasons" exist. --B music ian 14:32, 3 March

YouTube Here. Search "Annoying Orange" and you will see even YouTube marks it with seasons. However, I can't work up the wikitext to work on it, so I'll let someone else talk to me about it on my talk page.

Walex03 (talk) 20:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and take a look at this.

W (talk) 13:46, 6 March 2012 (UTC)alex03 13:46, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I get your point. --B music ian 14:53, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can I have someone to help me out with the wiki code?

W (talk) 20:58, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

This page seems to have had a lot of random changes to the episode release dates. This seems to be a common form on vandalism. See List of Mortal Kombat: Legacy episodes. I am not sure what date changes are accurate, and which ones are vandalism. I tried to track all the episodes on Youtube but their simply is too much. It would be nice to have someone familiar with the show help fix it. Thanks. Oldag07 (talk) 04:51, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:The Annoying Orange which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:03, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Season 14 Hex Color Code

What hex color code should I add for Season 14? The code with the most votes wins Annoyingorangefan2000 (talk) 18:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the winner is #CCCCFF Annoyingorangefan2000 (talk) 18:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Error in Ask Orange 75

There is an error in the episode "Ask Orange #75: Infinite Airbags. It is Pear that gets hit by infinite airbags, not Orange. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annoyingorangefan2000 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precursor Shorts

@Walex03 Before the Annoying Orange, Dane Boe also created "From the Fridge," a series of short episodes sharing the same concept of anthrophomortic foods that ran from late 2006 to early 2011 on both JibJab and his YouTube channel. Is it better if I add these to the list of Annoying Orange episodes? Chadalvarez2021 (talk) 22:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Annoying Orange Supercut - EVERY VIDEO EVER!

According to the description, a few episodes from "Annoying Orange Supercut - EVERY VIDEO EVER!", which supposedly has every single episode from October 9, 2009 to September 25, 2015, are absent. Can someone inform me what specific episodes aren't in the compilation? 68.132.67.5 (talk) 02:00, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Season 16 (2024)

Could you pls help me expand the Season 16 part, i really really want you to help me. Hex color code: 808000. 188.163.84.158 (talk) 09:42, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]