Katy Perry Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Katy Perry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Katy Perry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Katy PerryWikipedia:WikiProject Katy PerryTemplate:WikiProject Katy PerryKaty Perry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Pop music Mid‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

So I guess it's not a single.

That's perfectly fine, we can wait until we get a release date. I don't want an article war like in Firework haha.

76.103.131.40 (talk) 01:34, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's a single now so i think we need a page :) 98.225.198.202 (talk) 21:54, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why not?

The subject is notable enough and there's momentum built up, there's no harm in removing the re-direct. I understand rules are rules, but the song is soaring up iTunes and the radio. Shouldn't Wikipedia be helpful? When people come on here, they want to learn about the song, not be redirected somewhere else.

What I'm saying is, in the spirit of the law, this should be an article (It's really quite notable). It's now a completely official full blown single from one of the world's biggest pop stars...if there were no rules no one in their right mind would not support a page for this song. In the letter of the law, this shouldn't be an article yet, but I'm just saying there's really no harm in removing the redirects and revealing the information for all. :) Peterbrabel (talk) 02:48, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected

This title has been protected as a redirect to Teenage Dream (Katy Perry album) for one month, per a request at RFPP. Some editors are warring to restore this as a full article, but there is no talk page consensus that a separate article on the song ought to exist. (Editors in general are not convinced that the song has been released as a single). If consensus is found that a separate article is justified, ask for unprotection at WP:RFPP. EdJohnston (talk) 03:55, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Date?

Billboard said the song was to impact mainstream radio in the US on September 28th, but then we have another source stating that it was sent to mainstream radio on the 11th of October. "Full release"? That doesn't make any sense at all. Quite evidently, the September date didn't happen as planned and was changed to the 11th. — Status {^talk_contribs 21:03, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Genre=

Pop and dance pop? Sure the song is both, but dance pop is a subgenre of pop, so putting both genres is redundant since every dance pop song is also pop, im going to remove dance pop, since in the composition section says that its a pop song with influences of dance pop and teen pop. if anyone disagrees please say so, thank you 24.227.9.114 (talk) 17:48, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shot0010.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Shot0010.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:36, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:THOEONETHATGOTAWAY.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:THOEONETHATGOTAWAY.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:28, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]