Talk:The Tale of Despereaux

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Tale of Despereaux article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Novels: Fantasy Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force.

Children's literature High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Women writers High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cleanup

I added the re-write tag. The plot summary is difficult to follow, and doesn't seem to outline a complete plot. The Film section needs a healthy copy-edit at the very least. Since the article is short, it might be more worthwhile to simply rewrite the whole thing... I am not familiar with the book, so I am not currently able to offer any other assistance. Sorry! 7secondsed 17:47, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article about the upcoming film should be completely separate (i.e., it needs its own article). There's enough information about the book to expand this article by a great length. It's in pretty bad shape now :-( -DMCer (talk) 18:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This Book has 4 books to it. 67.167.61.28 (talk) 00:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are still a LOT of grammatical and spelling errors, as well as sense and tense flaws that make the article very difficult to follow, especially in the plot synopses of the individual books. Compared to other book articles I have read here, this really needs some clean up.Thumbcat (talk) 19:10, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously

Did some third grader write the plot synopsis as part of a book report? Shostie (talk) 23:36, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Succession box removed

I've removed the succession box. This article is about a novel, not about the history of the Newbery Medal. The books that came before and after are completely unrelated, too.

This idea of succession is appropriate where a single author is involved, or a single series. (It also works to a degree in pop chart ratings, where an artist's popularity in a sense displaces another's.) But here there is no logical connection to the topic. It isn't any more important than the ISBN number that came before.

Finally, it's intrusive. The box caught my eye, I scrolled down, and discovered nothing of interest related to the topic. Piano non troppo (talk) 22:18, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe this was appropriate. The succession box formed a link in, essentially, a navigation chain of Newbery Award winners, which is now broken on The Tale of Despereaux and nowhere else. I think if you're going to remove something that's part of a broader context like that, you should be engaging discussion about whether the broader context should exist, not breaking it locally. chaos5023 (talk) 15:31, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I first couldn't find an appropriate place to introduce the topic. Then, when I did, decided to leave this here, in case the other wasn't seen (which apparently it hasn't been). It's here: [1] Is that the proper place? Regards, Piano non troppo (talk) 22:15, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Has a few spelling errors, but overall very good! I can fix the spelling, if nobody else will. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fablina (talk • contribs) 23:38, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I thought...

I thought we were supposed to be polite. I don't know why, but on the Internet, people seem to forget they're communicating with actual people who have feelings. Fablina (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:15, 17 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]

You are correct; we are supposed to be WP:CIVIL. —chaos5023 (talk) 15:48, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Red Carpet?

Last time I read this book, it was a red tablecloth, a hen, and a handful of cigarettes that Mig's father traded her for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StolenApples (talk • contribs) 01:47, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Side Box

Hi, I noticed the side box of the page was messed up somehow, I'm posting it here hoping someone can help I don't know how to fix side boxes.Etineskid (talk) 02:06, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What happened to "Book III: Gor! The Tale of Miggery Sow?"

For some reason, this article has summarys of Books I, II, and IV, but not Book III. What happened to it? Did this article get rewritten at some point, and it's still waiting for a rewrite of summary for Book III, or was there vandalism that nobody noticed? I'd write the summary myself, but I don't have a copy of the book handy, and don't remember it well enough the summarize from memory. Can someone please help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.108.22.92 (talk) 02:28, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]