Talk:Thoughts and prayers

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Thoughts and prayers article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

English Language Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Language, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the English language on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.English LanguageWikipedia:WikiProject English LanguageTemplate:WikiProject English LanguageEnglish Language articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Politics: American / Gun politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by Gun politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: 50,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Sources

---Another Believer _(Talk) 19:58, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good article....🤡 47.219.81.65 (talk) 13:56, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ridiculously liberal bias

As usual, it’s hard to take Wikipedia seriously when an entire article about a phrase used by millions across the political spectrum is almost completely a dig at Trump and conservatives. Most people I know who use this empty phrase are liberals. Alexandermoir (talk) 21:50, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this article is hilarious for this reason. I don't want it deleted, and I don't want anyone "fixing" this. It should remain up and show how ridiculous wikipedia is with their bias. 47.219.81.65 (talk) 13:55, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Both of could perhaps help improve the article by adding properly sourced examples of the use of the expression by people from what you call the "liberal" side of politics. HiLo48 (talk) 23:04, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Properly sourced" when most of non-liberal sources are on "not proper sources" list... 185.216.51.132 (talk) 12:10, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexandermoir I took it upon myself to edit the article into a more neutral stance, reducing the bias substantially. There's probably some merit in the existence of the article, but it's true that sources showing its use by non-conservatives would be appropriate per Wikipedia's neutrality policy.

I added one where President Obama used the phrase in response to a shooting at Fort Hood, but I have no doubt there are many others. The recent assassination attempt on President Trump would likely yield many uses from non-conservatives if someone wants to add to it. 2600:8800:1220:600:70A6:E61B:9E6F:CEA3 (talk) 22:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]