Talk:Todd Haberkorn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Orphaned references in Todd Haberkorn[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Todd Haberkorn's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ep1":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 09:23, 10 October 2016 (UTC)


This ISN'T IMDB Pro! Should be Removed

Way too many people are -incorrectlyItalic text

- utilising Wikipædia - what is,an encyclopedia - as a 'CV/resumé' place,Businesses are doing the same; they're putting in 'reports to investors' as if this was for their clients.

It's not - any of these.

It's an encyclopedic database - and there are criteria for what should (and shouldn't) be included (or excluded).

Nothing against this individual (I am a fan of his work on Star Trek Continues), however; this is not the place to put - what is - essentially nothing more than a IMDb Pro entrée.

19 April, 2017 UNOwenNYC — Preceding unsigned comment added by UNOwenNYC (talkcontribs) 2017-04-19 (UTC)

I've re-assessed this article to stub. It needs a decent biography that highlights his most notable work. The filmography might stay about that size though since it can be sourced to the actual programs. I agree though it does not need to look like a resume. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 02:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)