Talk:Tokimeki Memorial 3: Yakusoku no Ano Basho de

Video games: Visual novels Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the visual novels task force.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Solo leveling: Unlimited (2 participants)
Game Sack (3 participants)
Delibird (10 participants)
Melee weapon (3 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants)
Julia Chang (7 participants)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (7 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (10 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Engine and reception section

The recent edits to this page cite the engine for this game as 'Renderware'. This is an unsubstantiated claim and also introduced irrelevant comparisons to Grand Theft Auto III and Driver 2 in the notes and reception section. Concerning reception, sources cited seem vague and did not contain relevant information to the claims made. For example, the specific claim about plagarism comes from a user review aggregation site. The aggregate score and my own anecodatal experiences doesn't dispute the broad claims of poor public reception to this game, but Wikipedia policy does not seem to count user reviews as a reliable source for specific claims.

Concerning the Famitsu score, the web page score for Famitsu is only the original score out of 40 points, multiplied 2.5 times in order to fit into a 100-point scale. Most other articles on video games on Wikipedia reference the magazine score, which is on a 40-point scale. The addition of the 100-point scale feels spurious.

While it appears to make sense to me to revert most of these changes, certain aspects such as the addition citing sales numbers and simply noting the aggregate review score in comparison to the Famitsu score still seems relevant though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SaracenOne (talk • contribs) 12:16, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]