Talk:TopWare Interactive

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Bejeweled Stars (1 participant)
Melee (game terminology) (2 participants)
Solo leveling: Unlimited (2 participants)
Game Sack (4 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (8 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Untitled

The Lawsuit mentioned in the article, does not apply to the company TopWare Interactive AG, headquartered in Germany. TopWare Interactive AG had and has not court case with a company called Interplay and had and has no debts to such company. Please remove this section from Wikipedia, as this is libel and reputational damage. Thanks in advance.

The article does not say that TopWare Interactive AG were involved in a court case.
The article currently says that Topware Interactive Inc were involved in a court case, and the cited reference, including an extract from the court judgment, appears to bear this out.
Are you saying that there is not, and never has been, any relationship whatsoever between TopWare Interactive AG and Topware Interactive Inc? - Arjayay (talk) 19:42, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:CRITICISM, we typically prefer to avoid dedicated sections like "lawsuits" because it draws undue attention to controversial aspects. Rather it should be part of the company's history. The lawsuit is for a subsidiary (or something), but unless that subsidiary is notable enough for a separate page, our normal practice is to consolidate them. CorporateM (Talk) 17:43, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is this company defunct or not?

This article is very inconsistent in terms of whether or not this company has disestablished or not: it's all in the present tense, talks about it having gone bankrupted and yet states it's currently developing a game for next year. So what actually is the company, dead or alive? NP Chilla (talk) 14:20, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source