This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
I know the website is clearly pro-Palestinian, however the basic fact that Zangariyya was depopulated or abandoned prior to its capture by Israeli forces could be mentioned in the article without a reference. I stated that Tuba was not depopulated or attacked from the previous text you instated. These statements as well as the additional statements that surround the claim could be supported by Walid Khalidi's book on the Palestinian exodus which describes most if not all depopulated Arab towns in present-day Israel - Why Did the Palestinians Leave? Middle East Forum, (July 1959) If you would like me to use this source as I can see it is less controversial and more factual than the website, then this is what I will do.
Yes, I think that we should have a better ref that that Web site. Bigglove 13:47, 23 July 2007 (UTC) Oh, and by the way, I just wanted to make clear that it doesn't matter about the specific bias of a source, but the source you were using is not a RS. Bigglove13:01, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]