Talk:Upper nobility

Hungary B‑class Mid‑importance

	Hungary portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Croatia Low‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Slovakia

	Slovakia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovakia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Slovakia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SlovakiaWikipedia:WikiProject SlovakiaTemplate:WikiProject SlovakiaSlovakia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Romania

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Help Romania reach at least GA-status
- Help History of Romania get WP:GOOD
- Request an article or create a missing one
Assess :
- Assess all articles tagged for this project that have not been assessed for quality
Cleanup :
- Review the Romania-related cleanup listing
- Normalize the use of "Northern Bukovina" (capitalized) and "Northern Bessarabia" (Bessarabian part of Chernivtsi Oblast) all over Wikipedia
Disambiguation :
- Disambiguate project articles and get points
Expand :
- Expand Postage stamps and postal history of Romania
Translate :
- Translate Romania-related articles from the Romanian Wikipedia
- Translate and keep in sync with the project versions in other languages: Projet:Roumanie (in French), Proiect:România (in Romanian), Проект:Румыния (in Russian)
Unreferenced : * Add more reference to FC CFR Timișoara.
Other :
- Make use in articles of the newly contributed images (about 5800!!) from the Wiki Loves Monuments Romania 2011 (WLM Romania external site)
- Review newly created Romania-related articles
- Check the articles needing expert attention or other work, and help with some of the items
- Create Awards for WikiProject Romania
- Contribute photos related to Romania at Commons:WikiProject Romania. Organize Romania related images on Commons. See also media-related tasks

Mistakes

Országh de Guth and Komploth de Nána are the correct forms in the reference. --Csesznekgirl (talk) 18:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Split references from footnotes

Please consider using note tags and a new section to separate the inline references from personal comments/notes.Lajbi ^{Holla @ me} 10:55, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lead was too long, now too short)

I've shortened the lead (as per [lead too long] tag) and put the remains under a "Upper nobility" heading. However, it now probably needs fleshing out. — Msmarmalade (talk) 09:53, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Upper nobility/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

==March 2013==

The article is fine regarding WP:BCLASS criteria #2 (coverage - quite comprehensive), #4 (language), #5 (supporting materials), and #6 (accessibility).

Still, the article's intro is: a) too long (at nine paragraphs and 900+ words), b) is not actually a summary, as it addresses topics that are not covered in the article proper, and 3) is not referenced at all (and it should be, as it not merely a summary). I feel this is grounds for failing the article on criteria #1 (referencing) and #3 (structure). This should not be too difficult to fix in an otherwise quite commendable article: content is to be moved from the intro to the article proper and supplied with references, leaving the summarized intro of acceptable size. GregorB (talk) 15:09, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 15:15, 27 March 2013 (UTC). Substituted at 09:42, 30 April 2016 (UTC)