Jump to content

Talk:Victoria–Courtenay train

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Alternate format

[edit]

Data here should be merged into chart such as Southern_Railway_of_Vancouver_Island#Chart and put in as a new section, perhaps called Passenger Service in Southern Railway of Vancouver Island. --KenWalker | Talk 03:50, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Title needs to be corrected

[edit]

The spaced en dash in the title should be replaced with an un-spaced en dash, as in the "a New York–Los Angeles flight" example in MOS:NDASH. To be exact,

Victoria – Courtenay train

should be corrected to

Victoria–Courtenay train

Jim10701 (talk) 08:23, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Really badly worded sentence

[edit]

I almost can't make heads or tails of the followung:

In July 2014, following successful funds reached by the local, federal and provincial governments to replace trackage and repair bridges along the line...

This sentence is as clear as mud! "...successful funds reached...?! There's got to be a better way to say this, so it's clear. Any ideas?... --IJBall (talk) 02:28, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved
 – Figured out a better way to word that. --IJBall (talk) 03:33, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Victoria–Courtenay train. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:40, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Victoria–Courtenay train. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:13, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Victoria–Courtenay train. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:47, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contradictory Dates

[edit]

Confused by this excerpt here in the history section: “Via Rail began operating the passenger train in 1979. During a period of low ridership, all trains terminated at Parksville and a bus continued to Courtenay. Service to Courtenay resumed in 1977". It is unclear how service to Courtney resumes in 77' when the service itself began in 79'. I'm assuming 1977 is a typo and it should be a much later date, but I cannot find the real date in the articles reference list. Kristian.blais (talk) 16:07, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]