Talk:Voyager 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Good articleVoyager 1 has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 1, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
November 21, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
November 23, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 23, 2014Peer reviewReviewed
May 23, 2015Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Italics[edit]

Shouldn't Voyager 1 be italicized? Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:27, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Voyager 1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

December 2017 Use of Backup Thrusters[edit]

Found article in The Irish Times that NASA had announced that Voyager 1's backup thrusters had be fired up, the first time in 37 years. The thrusters will allow Voyager 1 to continue for the next one to years to send data back to NASA.

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/science/voyager-1-spacecraft-thrusters-fire-up-after-decades-idle-1.3315654 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sydney Rigdon (talkcontribs) 21:43, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Gyroscopic operations continuation is then more than 2017. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:302:D13A:5DA0:70D8:5816:60D4:300 (talk) 20:43, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Was certain external cabling on Voyager 1 covered with aluminum foil?[edit]

From what I remember, one of the things mentioned in the documentary "The Farthest: Voyager in Space" was that concerns arose about Jupiter's magnetic fields shortly before Voyager 1 was to be launched. Specifically, the concern was that systems on the spacecraft could be damaged or destroyed if certain external cabling on the spacecraft was exposed to Jupiter's magnetic fields. To provide protection, certain parts of Voyager 1 were covered with kitchen-grade aluminum foil and the foil was connected or bonded to a grounded portion of the spacecraft.

Among other places, there is mention of this use of aluminum foil in this AOL News article and in this Daily News article. If the claim about using kitchen-grade aluminum foil to protect external cabling on the spacecraft is accurate and can be reliably sourced, it might be worth a quick mention in the article. --Elegie (talk) 06:25, 21 June 2018 (UTC)