Talk:Warpig (band)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Former good article nomineeWarpig (band) was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
March 18, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Warpig (band)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I am beginning the GA review of Warpig.

Reviewer: Torchiest (talk | contribs) 05:25, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


This article is still very small, and needs a lot of work to get to GA status

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    I see no major problems with the prose, but both sections of the history are very short. Also, there is no section explaining the band's style of music, which is mentioned in the lead. I noticed that both of the biographies you reference are substantially longer than the article itself. Also, perhaps you could find some information about their tours and live shows. Since there is no separate page for the album, perhaps a section for that, as well as a review section, would help to make the article more informative.
    B. MoS compliance:
    You need to change all date ranges to use en dashes: –
    It looks like you're using them only some of the time.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    You'll need more references in order to expand this article.
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    The article is too small. You'll need to add a lot more information as outlined above.
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    Can't rate with no images.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    No images are used. It may be difficult to get an acceptable image, but it would be quite helpful to include at least one.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    This article is still more like a stub. It needs a lot of fleshing out, but it could become a good article with a lot of work. Good luck!
    Nominator withdrew nomination. Torchiest (talk | contribs) 00:58, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer:Torchiest (talk | contribs) 13:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC)