Jump to content

Talk:Weronika Rosati

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Activism against domestic violence

[edit]

I notice the Polish article has a dedicated section about this, but ours only a sentence. I suggest expanding it. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:33, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done ArturSik (talk) 14:30, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Weronika Rosati/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 22:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
 Done
  • Add a comma after "Last Vegas (2013)".
 Done
  • "Aside acting" → "Aside from acting"
 Done

Life and career

[edit]

Early life and education

[edit]
  • Remove the comma after "Warsaw Ochota Theatre".
 Done
  • "trained dancing" → "trained in dancing"
 Done
  • "taka" → "take"
 Done
  • Add a comma after "Larry Moss Studio".
 Done

Acting career

[edit]
  • Add a comma after "panned by critics".
 Done
  • "Polish actors successful" → "successful Polish actors"
 Done
  • The phrase "international scene" doesn't sound right, so try rewording.
 Done
  • "guest starred" → "guest-starred"
 Done
  • "and the 1940s" → "and 1940s"
 Done

Personal life and non-acting work

[edit]
  • "to leg injury" → "to a leg injury"
 Done
  • Remove the comma after "unable to walk".
 Done
  • "and a continual" → "and continual"
 Done
  • "in relationship" → "in a relationship"
 Done
  • "list of 100" → "list of the 100"
 Done
  • "of Polish" → "of the Polish"
 Done
  • "guest hosted" → "guest-hosted"
 Done

Filmography

[edit]
  • This section looks good.

References

[edit]
  • For the cite bundle after "respectively", add bullet points before each source.
 Done
  • Sources are already archived.
  • Websites are also linked.

@Some Dude From North Carolina: All done. Thanks so much for your review. ArturSik (talk) 19:39, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·