This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Speed Skating, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of speed skating-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Numbers with five or more digits to the left of the decimal point (i.e. 10,000 or greater) should be delimited into groups so they can be easily parsed, such as by using a comma (,) every three digits (e.g. 12,200, 255,200, 8,274,527).
Oppose. I respectfully disagree – quote-unquote GHWB (first budget) – as I think the MOS should be amended. When 10k is at the end of the range of distances, I think this will introduce an awkward inconsistency, for a single entry at the end of a list. Let's have the discussion at MOS first. HandsomeFella (talk) 15:30, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
There is no need for discussion at MOS first unless you propose to amend MOS to allow the current naming. This proposal is to bring the article title in line with MOS, as it is currently non-compliant. —sroc💬 14:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Support for consistency with the guideline. Bandy boy (talk) 11:40, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Support I expressed such concerns in the last group move. I still don't see it as particularly important, but while we have a guideline, we might as well follow it. These are poor titles anyway. They're junk grammatically. --BDD (talk) 17:40, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Support - per MOS. If some editors believe the MOS should be amended, that discussion should take place at WT:MOS, not here. Parsecboy (talk) 18:11, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.