This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
The article doesn't really say anything about the use of Worm and hole in the name. It's not majorly important to wormholes, but seems like it ought to be mentioned.--Varkman (talk) 00:41, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
It may be that some "equations of the theory of general relativity have valid solutions that contain wormholes". But is that the only basis for arguing for "its robust theoretical strength"? If that is the case, this is contrary to the scientific method, and not at all robust.184.108.40.206 (talk) 08:28, 26 May 2015 (UTC)