Jump to content

List of bitcoin forks

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Taproot (fork))

Bitcoin forks are defined variantly as changes in the protocol of the bitcoin network or as the situations that occur "when two or more blocks have the same block height".[1] A fork influences the validity of the rules. Forks are typically conducted in order to add new features to a blockchain, to reverse the effects of hacking or catastrophic bugs. Forks require consensus to be resolved or else a permanent split emerges.

Forks of the client software

The following are forks of the software client for the bitcoin network:

Bitcoin XT
A fork initiated by Mike Hearn. The current reference implementation for bitcoin contains a computational bottleneck.[2] The actual fork was preceded by Mike Hearn publishing a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP 64) on June 10, 2014, calling for the addition of "a small P2P protocol extension that performs UTXO lookups given a set of outpoints."[src 1] On December 27, 2014 Hearn released version 0.10 of the forked client XT, with the BIP 64 changes.[src 2] It achieved significant attention within the bitcoin community in mid-2015 amid a contentious debate among core developers over increasing the block size cap.[3]
On June 22, 2015, Gavin Andresen published BIP 101 calling for an increase in the maximum block size. The changes would activate a fork allowing eight MB blocks (doubling in size every two years) once 75% of a stretch of 1,000 mined blocks is achieved after the beginning of 2016.[src 3] The new maximum transaction rate under XT would have been 24 transactions per second.[4]
On August 6, 2015 Andresen's BIP101 proposal was merged into the XT codebase.[src 4][src 5] Bip 101 was reverted[src 6] and the 2-MB block size bump of Bitcoin Classic was applied instead.[citation needed]
The August 2015 release of XT received widespread media coverage. The Guardian wrote that "bitcoin is facing civil war".[3]
Wired wrote that "Bitcoin XT exposes the extremely social—extremely democratic—underpinnings of the open source idea, an approach that makes open source so much more powerful than technology controlled by any one person or organization."[5] Developer Adam Back was critical of the 75% activation threshold being too low and that some of the changes were insecure.[6]
On August 25, 2017, Bitcoin XT published Release G, which was a Bitcoin Cash client by default.[src 7] Subsequently, Release H was published, which supported the November 2017 Bitcoin Cash protocol upgrade, followed by Release I, which supported the May 2018 Bitcoin Cash protocol upgrade.[citation needed]
Bitcoin Classic
In its first 8 months, Bitcoin Classic promoted a single increase of the maximum block size from one megabyte to two megabytes.[7] In November 2016 this changed and the project moved to a solution that moved the limit out of the software rules into the hands of the miners and nodes.[8]
Bitcoin Unlimited

All three software clients attempt to increase transaction capacity of the network. None achieved a majority of the hash power.[9]

Intended hard forks splitting the cryptocurrency

Hard forks splitting bitcoin (aka "split coins") are created via changes of the blockchain rules and sharing a transaction history with bitcoin up to a certain time and date. The first hard fork splitting bitcoin happened on 1 August 2017, resulting in the creation of Bitcoin Cash.

The following is a list of notable hard forks splitting bitcoin by date and/or block:

  • Bitcoin Cash: Forked at block 478558, 1 August 2017, for each bitcoin (BTC), an owner got 1 Bitcoin Cash (BCH)
    • Bitcoin SV: Forked at block 556766, 15 November 2018, for each Bitcoin Cash (BCH), an owner got 1 Bitcoin SV (BSV).
    • eCash: Forked at block 661648, 15 November 2020, for each Bitcoin Cash (BCH), an owner got 1,000,000 eCash (XEC).
  • Bitcoin Gold: Forked at block 491407, 24 October 2017, for each bitcoin (BTC), an owner got 1 Bitcoin Gold (BTG)

Intended soft forks splitting from a not-most-work block

  • The fork fixing the value overflow incident was controversial because it was announced after the exploit was mined. It was assigned CVE-2010-5139.

Intended soft forks splitting from the most-work block



Taproot is an agreed soft fork in the transaction format. The fork adds support for Schnorr signatures, and improves functionality of smart contracts and the Lightning Network. The fork was installed in November 2021.[10] The upgrade adds privacy features.[11][12] Taproot includes Bitcoin Improvement Proposal numbers BIP340, BIP341, BIP342.[13]


  • Complex transactions, such as those requiring multiple signatures or those with delayed release, are indistinguishable from simple transactions in terms of on-chain data.[citation needed]
  • Reduced transaction costs: The data size of complex Bitcoin transactions is reduced, which leads to lower transaction fees.[citation needed]
  • Support for more complicated conditions for a transaction via Schnorr signatures.[citation needed]
  • Benefits for the Lightning Network: More flexibility, privacy enhancement, lower costs.[citation needed]

Unintended hard forks

Two hard forks were created by "protocol change" definition:

  • March 2013 Chain Fork (migration from BerkeleyDB to LevelDB caused a chain split)[14]
  • CVE-2018-17144 (Bitcoin 0.15 allowed double spending certain inputs in the same block. Not exploited)


Source code

  1. ^ "bips/bip-0064.mediawiki at master · bitcoin/bips · GitHub". GitHub.
  2. ^ "bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt". GitHub.
  3. ^ "bips/bip-0101.mediawiki at master · bitcoin/bips · GitHub". GitHub.
  4. ^ "Implement hard fork to allow bigger blocks · bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt@946e3ba". GitHub.
  5. ^ "bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt". GitHub.
  6. ^ "2MB block size bump by dgenr8 · Pull Request #117 · bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt". GitHub.
  7. ^ "Bitcoin XT Releases". GitHub. Retrieved 17 June 2018.

Other references

  1. ^ Antonopoulos, Andreas (2017). Mastering Bitcoin: Programming the Open Blockchain (2 ed.). USA: O' Reilly media, inc. p. Glossary. ISBN 978-1491954386.
  2. ^ Maria Bustillos (25 August 2015). "Inside the Fight Over Bitcoin's Future". The New Yorker. Conde Naste. Retrieved 7 January 2017.
  3. ^ a b Alex Hern (17 August 2015). "Bitcoin's forked: chief scientist launches alternative proposal for the currency". the Guardian. Retrieved 20 August 2015.
  4. ^ Tim Hornyak (21 August 2015). "Bitcoin XT debate overshadowing growth opportunities". PC World. IDG. Retrieved 7 January 2017.
  5. ^ Cade Metz (19 August 2015). "The Bitcoin Schism Shows the Genius of Open Source". WIRED.
  6. ^ Everett Rosenfeld (20 August 2015). "Bitcoin splits: Will it break, or be better than ever?". CNBC. Retrieved 5 January 2017.
  7. ^ Paul Vigna (17 January 2016). "Is Bitcoin Breaking Up?". Wall Street Journal.
  8. ^ "Classic is Back". Archived from the original on 2017-02-02. Retrieved April 28, 2017.
  9. ^ Ammous, Saifedean (2018). The Bitcoin Standard: The Decentralized Alternative to Central Banking. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 227, 228. ISBN 9781119473893. Retrieved 23 April 2018.
  10. ^ Sigalos, MacKenzie (2021-06-09). "Bitcoin just got its first makeover in four years". CNBC. Retrieved 2021-06-15.
  11. ^ Kharif, Olga (2021-06-15). "Bitcoin to get more privacy features in Taproot update, making it harder to trace payments". Bloomberg. Retrieved 2021-06-23.
  12. ^ Locke, Taylor (2021-06-14). "7 key things that happened in crypto over the past week". CNBC. Retrieved 2021-06-23.
  13. ^ "All Bitcoin Improvement Proposals, including BIP340". 2021-06-01 – via GitHub.
  14. ^ March 2013 Chain Fork