Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Ácido Argentino

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
DYK toolbox

Ácido Argentino

(
)
  • Source: "Los 40 discos esenciales del metal argentino" [The essential 40 albums of Argentine metal] (in Spanish). Rolling Stone. May 16, 2024. Retrieved July 25, 2024.
5x expanded by Cambalachero (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 121 past nominations.

Cambalachero (talk) 19:34, 25 July 2024 (UTC).

General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: The article was expanded from 469 to 3169 characters of readable prose from July 23 to 25, and nominated on July 25. The length of the prose section is adequate, however the introduction is too short and makes the nomination look like a work in progress, as per WP:DYKCRIT. A better introduction will have at least two sentences summarizing the background and recording, and one sentence for the reception. The track listing is unsourced, and as per WP:RATEYOURMUSIC, a better source is needed that is not WP:DEPRECATED. The article is neutral in tone, and no plagiarism was detected. The hook is interesting to a broad audience, properly mentioned and cited in the article, and verified by the source in Spanish. The album cover image has an appropriate non-free license. The QPQ requirement is complete. Flibirigit (talk) 00:52, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Done. The track list does need references, no album article asks for that, not even featured ones. As for the personell, the album itself should be an acceptable primary source per WP:PRIMARY. Cambalachero (talk) 14:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
  • I have posed the question at WT:DYK with respect to citations for the track listing and personnel. Let's see what the consensus is. Otherwise, I see no concerns here. Best wishes. Flibirigit (talk) 14:30, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Fairly sure the tracklisting and personnel come under WP:PLOTSOURCE, although this does need a copyedit. WP:DYKRR says "only full reviews with no reliable predecessors count as a QPQ" and that nomination did have one - does it count?--Launchballer 14:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
That nomination needed a full review at that point (it was not a passing by comment). I can make a new review if needed, but in a couple of days, I'm out og town right now Cambalachero (talk) 15:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
My reading of WP:PLOTSOURCE is that it does not in fact apply to track listings and personnel. For one thing, it's explicitly talking about plot sections, and I really don't think either count as plot or even match the spirit of the guideline. Although one can assume good faith that the track listings and personnel are cited to the CD itself, it's always safe to make that clear especially to those who many not access to it. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:12, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Ácido_Argentino&oldid=1244370811"