The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 19:04, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
... that 14 April is Cake and Cunnilingus Day? (not pictured) Source: "14 April - Cake And Cunnilingus Day marks a clear response to Steak And Blow Job Day, and as a fan both cake and cunnilingus, I'm tempted to be all about this holiday. However, like all sex things, I can't jive unless it's an enthusiastic consent thing. No charitable component facade here, though, sadly." ([1])
ALT1:... that 14 April is the day for women to get cake and cunnilingus? (as above)
Overall: Thank you for this very nice, tasteful article. It gives several nods to women, for which we should be appreciative. ALT2 would be rather delicious for 1 April, methinks. But enough of my British humour. I did enjoy the line about the Italians missing the point, though (shut up Storye book). But seriously, this article is fine, and so are Alts 0, 1 and 2. Just one issue: you mention invitations in the header, but you don't mention them in the main text - and you don't explain the invitations, although it is explained in the citation within the header. So if you could add the invitations and the explanation to the main text, all would be well. Thank you again for making me smile. Storye book (talk) 12:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
And another thing: The "not pictured" in ALT0 is very funny. Please could I request that if ALT0 is used, that that bit stays? Thank you. Storye book (talk) 12:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Storye book, I've reorganised the article slightly. I'm not sure what the "invitations" are referring to (I didn't write that bit), but the source in question says "In addition, people are actually using these days to do something good ... Cake and Cunnilingus Day is aimed at supporting charities that combat prostate cancer." So I've reworded the article to reflect that.
And no problem with the "not pictured" :-) Ritchie333(talk)(cont) 12:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
for ALTs 1, 2 and 3 (ALTs 1 and 2 preferred by me, because funnier). Thank you, Ritchie333, for solving the minor issue. Don't forget, ALT 2 would work on 1 April as an alternative to 14 April, so it might be worth entering this nom for both dates. Good to go. Storye book (talk) 12:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Hopefully the gnomes preparing the preps and queues will spot this comment and respond appropriately. Ritchie333(talk)(cont) 12:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
I think you're expected to copy your nom into the 1 April area yourself (it's now on another page). To get it listed for another specific date, you have to organise another subheading on the nom page for that date. But leave the nom here as well - so it could end up in 3 places. That's what happened when I did that, anyway. @Yoninah: advice please? Storye book (talk) 13:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Hm. I'm actually not sure about a lot of this. Noms can't move to dates, except I think they can to April Fool's. We don't want it in two or three places, surely? Sorry for the runaround, but I'm going to ping BlueMoonset whose knowledge of DYK is encyclopedic. —valereee (talk) 13:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
If you want this to run on April Fools' Day, then the nomination transclusion should move to the April Fools' page from the Approved page. Right now, this is not eligible to run on April 14, which is over six weeks away—special occasion nominations are limited to six weeks in advance of the date. However, if this doesn't run on April 1, for whatever reason, it can be repurposed for April 14 at that time, and moved to the special occasions section of the Approved page (which is what I think Storye book meant). However, it is a move: nomination transclusions should not be left in place, but moved to the proper location. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
ALT2 on 1 April works for me. Who's suppose to do the move? Ritchie333(talk)(cont) 15:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for this very nice, tasteful article. It gives several nods to women, for which we should be appreciative. ALT2 would be rather delicious for 1 April, methinks. But enough of my British humour. I did enjoy the line about the Italians missing the point, though (shut up Storye book). But seriously, this article is fine, and so are Alts 0, 1 and 2. 
for ALTs 1, 2 and 3 (ALTs 1 and 2 preferred by me, because funnier). Thank you, Ritchie333, for solving the minor issue. Don't forget, ALT 2 would work on 1 April as an alternative to 14 April, so it might be worth entering this nom for both dates. Good to go. Storye book (talk) 12:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)