Template:Did you know nominations/Catholic Press

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:25, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Catholic Press

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the Catholic Press and the Australian Workers' Union periodical the Worker were the only two Australian newspapers opposing conscription in 1916–17?

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Bunostegos

Created by Casliber (talk). Self nominated at 14:09, 25 June 2013 (UTC).

• Long enough and new enough, will do. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 14:33, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
• There are concerns other than length and newness. While the source for the hook does show that the Catholic Press was against conscription, I can find no mention of the Worker in the same context. Ironholds (talk) 14:34, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

• Sorry, it was ref 1 - added now. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:57, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

• Aha; thanks :). from my POV. Ironholds (talk) 20:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC)