Template:Did you know nominations/James Scott Howard
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:29, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
James Scott Howard
[edit]
Portrait of Howard
... that James Scott Howard was the first postmaster in the newly formed City of Toronto that lost position during the Upper Canada Rebellion in 1837?- ALT1:
... that James Scott Howard was an early Canadian political activist, as he refused to open mail of suspected rebels before the 1837 uprising, infuriating his superiors? - ALT2:
...that James Scott Howard would serve as treasurer for the Home District, as a justice of the peace and with the Board of Education until his death?
- ALT1:
5x expanded by Oaktree b (talk). Self-nominated at 17:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC).
Interesting, on good sources, offline sources accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. Of the hooks, I like ALT1 best, but suggest to make it more interesting by having "infuriate" sooner, - afraid you will have lost readers who have no patience for boring "was an early Canadian political activist":- ALT3: ... that James Scott Howard (pictured), the postmaster of Toronto, infuriated his superiors by refusing to open mail of suspected rebels before the 1837 uprising? - Article: I changed the section headers but suggest you also supply the years. - Please get the father-in-law somewhere else (or did our subject marry in his later years?) and mention the wife! - Drop "would" (as we look at a past) in ALT2 and the article (if any, I changed one). - Please add pictured to all hooks as in ALT3, and drop where the painting is made, because we don't see it, not in small and not even in larger. - I'll get back to this later. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:16, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oaktree b, what do you think of ALT3, and the suggested changes? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:53, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, I like both ideas. Oaktree b (talk) 12:08, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- I thought it was four, or five ;) - Will you make the changes in the article? No need for changes in ALT1 and ALT2 if we can use ALT3. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:56, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, I like both ideas. Oaktree b (talk) 12:08, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Oaktree b: Did you address any of Gerda Arendt's concerns? @Gerda Arendt: what unaddressed concerns are left for you? --KAVEBEAR (talk) 04:39, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- I've been unable to do any of the suggested changes to the article and won't have time in the near future. If someone else can make them, that's fine with me. Oaktree b (talk) 15:39, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- I'll look, but may take a few days. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:54, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
I changed what I felt was necessary, please check because I moved refs if they are now missing for something else. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:57, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- I've been unable to do any of the suggested changes to the article and won't have time in the near future. If someone else can make them, that's fine with me. Oaktree b (talk) 15:39, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
