Template:Did you know nominations/Lavender (BadBadNotGood song)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:13, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Lavender (BadBadNotGood song)[edit]

(

)

... that President Donald Trump criticized Snoop Dogg's remix music video of "Lavender" for a having a scene in which Snoop fires a flag gun at a clown parody version of Trump?

Reviewed: "Why" (Taeyeon song)

Created by FallingGravity (talk). Self-nominated at 01:05, 25 March 2017 (UTC).

meets the requirements and yes he was president on the relevant date.©Geni (talk) 02:59, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

I'm opening this up for a new review. The review should be more specific and it doesn't seem like all criteria was checked. SL93 (talk) 03:21, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

I said it meets the requirements. If you want a point by point relisting of requirements I guess I can create a template for that. .©Geni (talk) 15:11, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

You could use {{DYK checklist}}. ^Falling_Gravity 16:31, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

©Geni, DYK reviewers are expected to go into additional detail. As it says at WT:DYK#How to review a nomination: Please begin with one of the 5 review symbols that appear at the top of the edit screen, and then indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed; your comment should look something like the following, after which is gives an example of what we're looking for. There's also further information in the reviewing guide linked to there. You don't need to use a checklist, but noting that you've checked for article length/expansion/GA, age, neutrality, sourcing, hook length and neutrality and sourcing, close paraphrasing/copyvio, QPQ, etc., is very helpful to the person who eventually comes along to promote this to prep. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:05, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

oh well it it makes you happy
In the past seven days the article was created, its readable prose was expanded at least fivefold, it was a previously unsourced biography of a living person (BLP) with its readable prose expanded at least twofold, or it was listed as a good article. It hasn't been featured on the Main Page's In the news section and hasn't previously appeared as a "qualifying article" in an earlier DYK. It contains at least 1,500 characters of readable prose and is not be a stub. The hook fact(s) is stated in the article, and is immediately followed by an inline citation to a reliable source. The article in general should uses inline cited sources. Sources are properly labelled in a references section and the references do not have bare URLs. Any direct quotations have been marked as such and cited to a reliable source. The article contains no dispute templates. The article does not violate Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people. The article does not contain plagiarism or close paraphrasing. The article deals with the subject in a neutral manner. The hook is properly formatted and is shorter than about 200 characters. The hook does not have neutrality problems or undue emphasis on a negative aspect of a living individual. There is no image.©Geni (talk) 16:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

ALT 1: ... that President Donald Trump criticized the music video for Snoop Dogg's remix of "Lavender" because of a scene in which Snoop fires a flag gun at a clown parody version of Trump?
ALT 2: ... that Snoop Dogg's video for his remix of "Lavender" was inspired by the shooting of Philando Castile?
I'm adding these alternate hooks. ^Falling_Gravity 06:57, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
The second one fails on the technicality that that the relevant sentence doesn't has a citation at the end (and I'd say that "inspired" by the shooting is going a bit far. Influenced perhaps). For the first its a pass but I'd suggest keeping any description of Trump's tweet as short and generic as possible. So yes its a bit harsh but I'm rejecting them.©Geni (talk) 16:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)