The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 01:50, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
... that the tunnel made by the larva of a small fly inside a birch tree may reach 17 m (56 ft)? Source: "Adults of P. betulae are 4 - 5 mm long." and "Larval tunnels can be extremely long (17 m)."
ALT1 ... that the fly Phytobia betulae is just 5 mm (0.2 in) long but the tunnel made by its larva inside a birch tree may reach 17 m (56 ft)?
Interesting article, as all of these are to nature nerds like me. :) I'm wondering if some more direct comparison of the size of the larva/fly vs. the length of the tunnel might take the hook up a notch? Like 'the 4mm (.2 inch) larva of a small fly blah blah blah' or something? I definitely think the tunnel length is the hook. --valereee (talk) 17:02, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. I have added ALT1. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:46, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Cwmhiraeth, I really like that! I'm approving both, with a preference for ALT1. --valereee (talk)
valereee (talk) 16:46, 5 June 2019 (UTC)