Jump to content

Template talk:Incumbent pope

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 10 July 2018

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 17:11, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


– The title of "pope" is not capitalised, per the Pope article and per MOS:JOBTITLES. These templates were previously moved from the new titles to the current titles without proper rationale. RAVENPVFF | talk ~ 04:43, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Incumbent Pope 2

[edit]

Why does the syntax for this exist? “Head” is a misleading term. On earth yes, but not on heaven. I refer to this discussion Talk:Catholic Church#Head field in infobox. I suggest refer removal of this syntax unless other uses can be shown.Manabimasu (talk) 17:30, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 26 May 2019

[edit]

Remove “Incumbent Pope 2” syntax. I refer to this discussion Talk:Catholic Church#Head field in infobox on the reason “Head” is misleading. Manabimasu (talk) 17:55, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. The current content of the template is:
[[Pope Francis|Francis]]<noinclude>
{{documentation}}
</noinclude>

What would you like removed? DannyS712 (talk) 18:25, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Change Incumbent Pope 2 syntax to nothing.Manabimasu (talk) 12:29, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind, I am doing the wrong process. Don’t change anything.Manabimasu (talk) 12:48, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Manabimasu: If you just want the infobox in the Examples section changed, you could do it yourself, as the documentation subpage is not protected. {{Incumbent pope 2}} is still useful in places like Template:College of Cardinals, so it shouldn't be deleted outright. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 12:50, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
ok, Incumbent Pope 2 is fine. I wanted to change the infobox “Head” field which was misleading. Thanks for telling me.Manabimasu (talk) 12:59, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 27 May 2019

[edit]

Add {{subst:tfd}} to the top of Template:Incumbent pope 2. Manabimasu (talk) 12:54, 27 May 2019 (UTC) or add {{subst:tfd|type=sidebar}} To the top of Template:Incumbent pope 2.Manabimasu (talk) 12:55, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Don’t do any of the changes. I did not see User:Ravenpuff comment.Manabimasu (talk) 12:57, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: as above, this template isn't going to be deleted. What other changes would you like to see be made to the template itself? — RAVENPVFF · talk · 14:02, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NoneManabimasu (talk) 14:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Incumbent pope 2

[edit]

Label 2 can have many titles. I propose that the documentation(Template:Incumbent pope 2/doc) link to Pope#Titles as possible label2 values.Manabimasu (talk) 15:16, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Documentation

[edit]

Is there a reason why Template:Incumbent Pope/doc and Template:Incumbent Pope 2/doc is the same? If not, I suggest both be changed to fit what the document is named after. Incumbent Pope 2 only documents the syntax and usage of

{{Incumbent Pope 2}}

and likewise for

{{Incumbent Pope}}

.Manabimasu (talk) 18:27, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Simply to allow users to compare both templates simultaneously, which is useful because both templates have similar functions. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 00:35, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Would it not be easier to merge both or redirect one of the documentation to the other? Manabimasu (talk) 00:51, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The two documentation pages are not exactly the same. More specifically, the Usage section provides information specific to the template in question. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 00:58, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I merged the documentation to avoid future confusion. –Zfish118talk 01:43, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]