From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

A transgene is a gene or genetic material that has been transferred naturally, or by any of a number of genetic engineering techniques from one organism to another. The introduction of a transgene has the potential to change the phenotype of an organism.

In its most precise usage, the term transgene describes a segment of DNA containing a gene sequence that has been isolated from one organism and is introduced into a different organism. This non-native segment of DNA may retain the ability to produce RNA or protein in the transgenic organism, or it may alter the normal function of the transgenic organism's genetic code. In general, the DNA is incorporated into the organism's germ line. For example, in higher vertebrates this can be accomplished by injecting the foreign DNA into the nucleus of a fertilized ovum. This technique is routinely used to introduce human disease genes or other genes of interest into strains of laboratory mice to study the function or pathology involved with that particular gene.

The construction of a transgene requires the assembly of a few main parts. The transgene must contain a promoter, which is a regulatory sequence that will determine where and when the transgene is active, an exon, a protein coding sequence, usually derived from the cDNA for the protein of interest, and a stop sequence. The way that all these parts are typically combined is in a bacterial plasmid and the coding sequences are typically chosen from previous transgenes with previously known function.[1] Transgenic or genetically modified organisms be they bacteria, viruses or fungi serve all kinds of research. Transgenic plants, insects, fish and mammals have been bred. Transgenic plants like corn and soybean have replaced wild strains in agriculture in some countries, such as the U.S. Transgene escape has been documented for GMO crops since 2001, with persistence and invasiveness. Transgenetic organisms pose ethical questions and cause biosafety problems.


The idea of shaping an organism to fit a specific need isn’t a new science, selective breeding of animals and plants started before recorded history. However, until the late 1900s farmers and scientist could breed new strains of a plant or organism only from closely related species, because the DNA had to be compatible for offspring to be able to reproduce another generation.[citation needed]

In the 1970 and 1980s, scientists passed this hurdle by inventing procedures for combining the DNA of two vastly different species with genetic engineering. The organisms produced by these procedures were termed transgenic. Transgenesis is the same as gene therapy in the way that they both transform cells for a specific purpose. They are completely different in their purposes, gene therapy wants to cure a defect in cells, and transgenesis seeks to produce a genetically modified organism by incorporating the specific transgene into every cell and changing the genome. Transgenesis will therefore not only change all the somatic cells, but also the germ cells so when the organisms reproduces, the transgenes are passed down to the offspring. Transgenes alter the genome by blocking the function of a host gene; they can either replace the host gene with one that codes for a different protein, or introduce an additional gene.[citation needed]

In 1978, yeast cells were the first organisms to undergo gene transfer. Mouse cells were first transformed in 1979 followed by mouse embryos in 1980. Most of the very first transmutations were performed by microinjection of DNA directly into cells. Scientist were able to develop other methods to perform the transformations, such as incorporating transgenes into retroviruses and then infecting cells, using electroinfusion which takes advantage of an electric current to pass foreign DNA through the cell wall, biolistics which is the procedure of shooting DNA bullets into cells, and also delivering DNA into the egg that has just been fertilized.[2]

The first transgenic animals were only intended for genetic research to study a specific genes function, and by 2003 thousands of genes had been studied.

Current Use: Plants[edit]

A variety of transgenic plants have been designed for agriculture to produce genetically modified crops, such as corn, soybean, rapeseed oil, cotton, rice and more. As of 2012, these GMO crops were planted on 170 million hectares globally.[3]

Golden Rice

One example of a transgenic plant species is golden rice. In 1997, five million children developed xerophthalmia, caused by vitamin A deficiency, every year in Southeast Asia alone.[4] Of those children, a quarter million went blind.[4] To combat this, scientists used biolistics to insert the daffodil phytoene synthase gene into Asia indigenous rice cultivars.[5] The daffodil insertion increased the production ß-carotene.[5] The product was a transgenic rice species rich in vitamin A, called golden rice. Little is known about the impact of golden rice on xerophthalmia because anti-GMO campaigns have prevented the full commercial release of golden rice into agricultural systems in need.[6]

Transgene escape[edit]

The escape of genetically-engineered plant genes via hybridization with wild relatives was first discussed and examined in Mexico[7] and Europe in the mid 1990s. There is agreement that escape of transgenes is inevitable, even "some proof that it is happening".[3] Up until 2008 there were few documented cases[3][8]


Corn sampled in 2000 from the Sierra Juarez, Oaxaca, Mexico contained a transgenic 35S promoter, while a large sample taken by a different method from the same region in 2003 and 2004 did not, a sample from another region from 2002 also did not, but directed samples taken in 2004 did, suggesting transgene persistence or re-introduction.[9] A 2009 study found recombinant proteins in 3.1% and 1.8% of samples, most commonly in southeast Mexico. Seed and grain import from the United States could explain frequency and distribution of transgenes in west-central Mexico, but not in the southeast. Also, 5.0% of corn seed lots in Mexican corn stocks expressed recombinant proteins despite the moratorium on GM crops.[10]


In 2011 transgenic cotton was found in Mexico among wild cotton, after 15 years of GMO cotton cultivation.[11]

Rapeseed (canola)

Transgenic oilseed rape Brassicus napus hybridized with a native Japanese species Brassica rapa were found in Japan in 2011[12] after they had been identified 2006 in Québec, Canada.[13] They were persistent over a 6-year study period, without herbicide selection pressure and despite hybridization with the wild form. This was the first report of introgression, meaning that genes from one gene pool had been stably incorporated into another, of an herbicide resistance transgene from Brassica napus into the wild form gene pool.[14]

Creeping bentgrass

Transgenic creeping bentgrass, engineered to be glyphosate tolerant, as "one of the first wind-pollinated, perennial, and highly outcrossing transgenic crops" was planted in 2003 as part of a large (about 160 ha) field trial in central Oregon near Madras, Oregon. In 2004, its pollen was found to have reached wild growing bentgrass populations up to 14 kilometres away. Cross-pollinating Agrostis gigantea was even found at a distance of 21 kilometres.[15] The grower, Scotts Company could not remove all genetically engineered plants and in 2007, the U.S. Department of Agriculture fined Scotts $500 thousand for non compliance with regulations in 2007.[16]

Risk assessment

The long term monitoring for and controlling of a particular transgene has been shown not to be feasible.,[17] which is concerning given the expansion of GMO crops to produce pharmaceuticals and other chemicals in so called pharming.

After more than a decade of transgenic plant dispersal there is little development of a risk assessment of transgenes escaping into the natural environment. The European Food Safety Authority published a guidance for risk assessment in 2010,[18] which is at odds with an EU directive Article 1, Dir. 2001/18)., the precautionary principle. Existing EU regulation does not provide legal clarity.

Current Use: Mice[edit]

Genetically modified mice are the most common animal model for transgenic research.[19] Transgenic mice are currently being utilized to study a variety of diseases including cancer, obesity, heart disease, arthritis, anxiety, and Parkinson’s disease.[20] The two most common types of genetically modified mice are knockout mice and oncomice. Knockout mice are a type of mouse model that uses transgenic insertion to disrupt an existing gene’s expression. In order to create knockout mice, a transgene with the desired sequence is inserted into an isolated mouse blastocyst using electroporation. Then, homologous recombination occurs naturally within some cells, replacing the gene of interest with the designed transgene. Through this process, researchers were able to demonstrate that a transgene can be integrated into the genome of an animal, serve a specific function within the cell, and be passed down to future generations.[21]

Oncomice are another genetically modified mouse species created by inserting transgenes that increase the animal’s vulnerability to cancer. Cancer researchers utilize oncomice to study the profiles of different cancers in order to apply this knowledge to human studies.[21]

Current Use: Drosophila[edit]

Multiple studies have be conducted concerning transgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster, the fruit fly. This organism has been a helpful genetic model for over 100 years, due to its well-understood developmental pattern. The transfer of transgenes into the Drosophila genome has been performed using various techniques, including P element, Cre-loxP, and ΦC31 insertion. The most practiced method used thus far to insert transgenes into the Drosophila genome utilizes P elements. The transposable P elements, also known as transposons, are segments of bacterial DNA that are translocated into the genome, without the presence of a complementary sequence in the host’s genome. P elements are administered in pairs of two, which flank the DNA insertion region of interest. Additionally, P elements often consist of two plasmid components, one known as the P element transposase and the other, the P transposon backbone. The transposase plasmid portion drives the transposition of the P transposon backbone, containing the transgene of interest and often a marker, between the two terminal sites of the transposon. Success of this insertion results in the nonreversible addition of the transgene of interest into the genome. While this method has been proven effective, the insertion sites of the P elements are often uncontrollable, resulting in an unfavorable, random insertion of the transgene into the Drosophila genome.[22]

To improve the location and precision of the transgenic process, an enzyme known as Cre has been introduced. Cre has proven to be a key element in a process known as recombination-mediated cassette exchange (RMCE). While it has shown to have a lower efficiency of transgenic transformation than the P element transposases, Cre greatly lessens the labor-intensive abundance of balancing random P insertions. Cre aids in the targeted transgenesis of the DNA gene segment of interest, as it supports the mapping of the transgene insertion sites, known as loxP sites. These sites, unlike P elements, can be specifically inserted to flank a chromosomal segment of interest, aiding in targeted transgenesis. The Cre transposase is important in the catalytic cleavage of the base pairs present at the carefully positioned loxP sites, permitting more specific insertions of the transgenic donor plasmid of interest.[23]

To overcome the limitations and low yields that transposon-mediated and Cre-loxP transformation methods produce, the bacteriophage ΦC31 has recently been utilized. Recent breakthrough studies involve the microinjection of the bacteriophage ΦC31 integrase, which shows improved transgene insertion of large DNA fragments that are unable to be transposed by P elements alone. This method involves the recombination between an attachment (attP) site in the phage and an attachment site in the bacterial host genome (attB). Compared to usual P element transgene insertion methods, ΦC31 integrates the entire transgene vector, including bacterial sequences and antibiotic resistance genes. Unfortunately, the presence of these additional insertions has been found to affect the level and reproducibility of transgene expression.

Future Potential[edit]

The study of application of transgenes is a rapidly growing area of molecular biology. In fact, it is predicted that in the next two decades, 300 000 lines of transgenic mice will be generated.[24] Researchers have identified many applications for transgenes, particularly in the medical field. Scientists are focusing on the use of transgenes to study the function of the human genome in order to better understand disease, adapting animal organs for transplantation into humans, and the production of pharmaceutical products products such as insulin, growth hormone, and blood anti-clotting factors from the milk of transgenic cows.[citation needed]

There are currently five thousand known genetic diseases, and the potential to treat these diseases using transgenic animals is, perhaps, one of the most promising applications of transgenes. There is a potential to use human gene therapy to replace a mutated gene with an unmutated copy of a transgene in order to treat the genetic disorder. This can be done through the use of cre-lox or knock out. Moreover, genetic disorders are being studied through the use of transgenic mice, pigs, rabbits, and rats. More recently, scientists have also begun using transgenic goats to study genetic disorders related to fertility[25]

Transgenes may soon be used for xenotransplantation from pig organs. Through the study of xeno-organ rejection, it was found that an acute rejection of the transplanted organ occurs upon the organs contact with blood from the recipient due to the recognition of foreign antibodies on endothelial cells of the transplanted organ. Scientists have identified the antigen in pigs that causes this reaction, and therefore, are able to transplant the organ without immediate rejection by removal of the antigen. However, the antigen begins to be expressed later on, and rejection occurs. Therefore, further research is being conducted.[citation needed]

Transgenes are being used by manufactures to produce goods such as milk with a high levels of proteins, silk from the milk of goats, and microorganisms that are capable of producing proteins that contain enzymes that increase the rate of industrial reactions. Agricultural applications aim to selectively breed animals for particular traits and animals that are resistant to diseases.[citation needed]

Ethical Controversy[edit]

Transgene use in humans is currently fraught with issues. Transformation of genes into human cells has not been perfected yet. The most famous example of this involved certain patients being treated for X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (X-SCID) developing T-cell leukemia.[26] This was attributed to the close proximity of the inserted gene to the LMO2 promoter, which controls the transcription of the LMO2 proto-oncogene.[27] In common with most forms of genetic engineering, the use of transgenes for purposes other than to correct life-threatening genetic abnormalities is a major bioethical issue.[citation needed]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ [1], A. J. Clark, A. L. Archibald, M. McClenaghan, J. P. Simons, R. Wallace and C. B. A. Whitelaw Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences , Vol. 339, No. 1288.
  2. ^ [2], Bryan D. Ness. (Feb 2004) Transgenic Organisms. Encyclopedia of Genetics Reference Edition.
  3. ^ a b c Gilbert, N. (2013). "Case studies: A hard look at GM crops". Nature 497 (7447): 24–26. doi:10.1038/497024a. PMID 23636378. Retrieved 23 October 2013. 
  4. ^ a b Sommer, Alfred (1988). "New imperatives for an old vitamin (A)" (PDF). Journal of Nutrition. 
  5. ^ a b Burkhardt, P.K. (1997). "Transgenic Rice (Oryza Sativa) Endosperm Expressing Daffodil (Narcissus Pseudonarcissus) Phytoene Synthase Accumulates Phytoene, a Key Intermediate of Provitamin A Biosynthesis.". Plant Journal. 
  6. ^ Harmon, Amy (2013-08-24). "Golden Rice: Lifesaver?". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2015-11-24. 
  7. ^ Arias, D. M.; Rieseberg, L. H. (November 1994). "Gene flow between cultivated and wild sunflowers". Theoretical and Applied Genetics 89 (6): 655–60. doi:10.1007/BF00223700. PMID 24178006. 
  8. ^ Kristin L. Mercer; Joel D. Wainwright (January 2008). "Gene flow from transgenic maize to landraces in Mexico: An analysis". Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 123 (1–3): 109–115. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2007.05.007.  (subscription required)
  9. ^ Piñeyro-Nelson A, Van Heerwaarden J, Perales HR, Serratos-Hernández JA, Rangel A, Hufford MB, Gepts P, Garay-Arroyo A, Rivera-Bustamante R, Alvarez-Buylla ER. (February 2009). "Transgenes in Mexican maize: molecular evidence and methodological considerations for GMO detection in landrace populations". Molecular Ecology 18 (4): 750–61. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03993. PMID 19143938. Retrieved 23 October 2015. 
  10. ^ Dyer GA, Serratos-Hernandez JA, Perales HR, Gepts P, Pineyro-Nelson A, et al.Dispersal of Transgenes through Maize Seed Systems in Mexico. PLoS ONE 4(5): e5734.(2009) doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0005734. PMC2685455.
  11. ^ Wegier, A., Piñeyro-Nelson, A., Alarcón, J., Gálvez-Mariscal, A., Álvarez-Buylla, E. R. and Piñero, D. (2011) Recent long-distance transgene flow into wild populations conforms to historical patterns of gene flow in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) at its centre of origin. Molecular Ecology, 20(19): 4182-4194.doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05258. PMID 21899621
  12. ^ Aono, M., Wakiyama, S., Nagatsu, M., Kaneko, Y., Nishizawa, T., Nakajima, N., Tamaoki, M., Kubo, A., Saji, H. Seeds of a possible natural hybrid between herbicide-resistant Brassica napus and Brassica rapa detected on a riverbank in Japan. GM Crops,(2011) 2(3): 201-10.
  13. ^ Simard, M.-J., Légère, A., Warwick, S.I. Transgenic Brassica napus fields and Brassica rapa weeds in Québec: sympatry and weedcrop in situ hybridization. Canadian Journal of Botany, (2006) 84(12): 1842-1851.DOI: 10.1139/b06-135
  14. ^ Warwick, S.I., Legere, A., Simard, M.J., James, T. Do escaped transgenes persist in nature? The case of an herbicide resistance transgene in a weedy Brassica rapa population. Molecular Ecology, (2008) 17(5): 1387-1395.PMID 17971090
  15. ^ Watrud, L.S., Lee, E.H., Fairbrother, A., Burdick, C., Reichman, J.R., Bollman, M., Storm, M., King, G.J., Van de Water, P.K. (2004) Evidence for landscapelevel, pollen-mediated gene flow from genetically modified creeping bentgrass with CP4 EPSPS as a marker. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(4): 14533-14538. PMID 15448206
  16. ^ USDA USDA concludes genetically engineered creeping bentgrass investigation USDA Assesses The Scotts Company, LLC $500,000 Civil Penalty. 26 November 2007
  17. ^ van Heerwaarden J, Ortega Del Vecchyo D, Alvarez-Buylla ER, Bellon MR.New genes in traditional seed systems: diffusion, detectability and persistence of transgenes in a maize metapopulation. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046123. PMID 23056246
  18. ^ EFSA Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants. EFSA Journal 2010; 8(11): 1879, doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1879
  19. ^ [3], "Background: Cloned and Genetically Modified Animals". Center for Genetics and Society. April 14, 2005.
  20. ^ [4]
  21. ^ a b Genetically modified mouse#cite note-8
  22. ^ Venken, K. J. T.; Bellen, H. J. (2007). "Transgenesis upgrades for Drosophila melanogaster". Development 134: 3571–3584. doi:10.1242/dev.005686. 
  23. ^ Oberstein, A., Pare, A., Kaplan, L., Small, S. (2005). Site-specific transgenesis by Cre-mediated recombination in Drosophila. Nature Methods. Vol 2. Pgs. 583-585. doi:10.1038/nmeth775.
  24. ^ Houdebine, L.-M. (2005), Use of Transgenic Animals to Improve Human Health and Animal Production. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 40: 269–281. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0531.2005.00596.x
  25. ^ Kues WA, Niemann H, 2004: The contribution of farm animals to human health. Trends Biotechnol 22, 286–294
  26. ^ Woods, N.-B., Bottero, V., Schmidt, M., von Kalle, C. & Verma, I. M. Nature 440, 1123 (2006) DOI: 10.1038/4401123a
  27. ^ Hacein-Bey-Abina, S. et al. Science 17 October 2003: Vol. 302 no. 5644 pp. 415-419 DOI: 10.1126/science.1088547

Further reading[edit]