User talk:Cwgreece

Proposed deletion of Operation Fabulous

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Operation Fabulous, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Speculation about upcoming television series with no sources.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Wperdue (talk) 03:16, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to True Beauty (TV series). Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please do not add ratings without sources. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 23:10, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

The article Aegean flying dolphins has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:35, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blonde Charity Mafia

Why did you remove the first run information for Blonde Charity Mafia. Reubot (talk) 14:36, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Viewership numbers for Life Unexpected

Hello. You recently changed the viewer numbers on the List of Life Unexpected episodes here: [1]. Similarly, yesterday it was changed by IP 74.235.90.30 here: [2] . The cited reference states in the article that the viewership was 2.74. (source) What am I missing here? I am confused as to why you changed it. If you have a source for this higher number, please add it. Thanks. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 21:57, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thnak you for chabging the source. I feel much better now! --Logical Fuzz (talk) 14:10, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Your addition to List of Love Bites episodes has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Episode summary copied work for word from Zap2it http://tvlistings.zap2it.com/tv/love-bites-tmi/EP012665940006 Logical Fuzz (talk) 12:24, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to List of Love Bites episodes has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Episode summary copied word-for-word from press release http://www.thefutoncritic.com/listings/20110523nbc17/ Logical Fuzz (talk) 13:50, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ratings sources

If the future, you should properly cite your references to avoid Bare URLs, or mere links to the site where you got your information. Identifying information such as author, title of article, date and publisher should readily be readable from the references section. The most recent addition you made to the ratings for Necessary Roughness should read, not so much like this, <ref>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2011/07/21/wednesday-cable-ratings-storage-wars-royal-pains-necessary-roughness-franklin-bash-rosannes-nuts-more/98610/</ref>, but like this; <ref>{{cite web |url=http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2011/07/21/wednesday-cable-ratings-storage-wars-royal-pains-necessary-roughness-franklin-bash-rosannes-nuts-more/98610/ |title=Wednesday Cable Ratings: 'Storage Wars,' 'Royal Pains' 'Necessary Roughness'; + 'Franklin & Bash,' 'Rosanne's Nuts' & More |last=Seidman |first=Robert |work=TV by the Numbers |date=July 21, 2011 |accessdate=July 21, 2011}}</ref>. And if you could click on the title of the articles before copying the URL, especially with TV by the Numbers, it would help; linking to the article through Twitter causes an extraneous tag at the end of the site information ( that isn't necessary. Clicking again on the article title once you're on the page refreshes it from the primary site location, leaving just the site address. Thanks in advance, KnownAlias X 21:14, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok!! Thanks for the info for the bare URLS!!

"The Vampire Diaries"

My apologies for reverting your edit on The Vampire Diaries third season page. I see that you did in fact add finals and your edit was not vandalism. Jayy008 (talk) 20:49, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ANTM All-Stars

Please don't place names are participated for America's Next Top Model, Cycle 17 in the lead section on cycles' articles. They're already on post-Top Model section. ApprenticeFan ^work 14:19, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Oh Sit!, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ABC and The Singing Bee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Grey's Anatomy (season 8), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kate Walsh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Istanbul Atatürk Airport, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 10:17, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hellenic Seaways, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hydra and Glossa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Olympic Air, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Delta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stockholm Arlanda Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athens Airport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A3 flights operated by both A3 itself and OA

Has there been such a discussion on WikiProject Airports? Because I have seen many major airports' articles listing flights of an airline to a certain destination both by itself and another airline. For example Leonardo da Vinci–Fiumicino Airport and Malpensa Airport.

If you just think we'd better not list the route twice, you should start a discussion here before reverting edits: WikiProject Airports.

Until a decision has been made by the community, please revert the changes you made to those articles. Thank you

Thakaran 22:31, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sea Jets

The article Sea Jets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no third party sources, no assertion of notability, see WP:GNG / WP:CORP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:46, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hellenic Seaways, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irakleia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aegean Airlines destinations

Searching on amadeus.net and aegeanair.com there appear to be no flights from Heraklion to Stansted, as you mentioned, from today until the end of October. Therefore the route is seasonal. Please be kind enough to revert your edit. Thank you Thakaran 16:10, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

There are no flights to Gatwick during April, May and June, flights from HER to Gatwick start in July. Therefore, since Gatwick is not served during these months it is a seasonal destination. You were right about Oslo though, it's just not available for booking through their website ;)

Thakaran 22:06, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited America's Next Top Model, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page J. Alexander. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aegean Airlines destinations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malta Airport. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Athens International Airport

Hi. Do you know if Aegean Airlines still flies to Abu Dhabi or is it now a codeshare service operated by Etihad Airways? Also, do you know if Aegean's service to Hamburg is still year-round or is it now seasonal. An IP continues to make these changes without a source or explaining why. Aegean's website still show Abu Dhabi as a destination (but not Hamburg). Citydude1017 (talk) 18:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kodikas Da Mitsi

The article Kodikas Da Mitsi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsuccessful show quickly cancelled, doesn't meet WP:GNG, no Greek article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:35, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kodikas Da Mitsi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kodikas Da Mitsi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kodikas Da Mitsi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 21:21, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Scouted

The article Scouted has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:04, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]