User:Endlessdan/archive2
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Endlessdan. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Oh girl I'm just a jeepster for your love
Archives·1: Snitches Get Stiches
·2 ·3 ·4 ·5 ·6.1 ·Prologue ·6.2: The Shrew ·6.3: The Cool Hand ·6.4: The Bootlicker ·7 ·8 ·9 ·X: Kelly, baby ·11.1: Juicy ·11.2 ·12 ·12: Cocksuckers
|
RE: CodyT3212Hi! To communicate with him, you should use their user talk page, not their user page: User_talk:CodyT3212. Every user or IP address has a talk page where you can communicate with them (the IP talk is bugged right now). Also whenever you revert vandalism or test edits, you should warn them using an appropriate message or warning. Some standardized messages can be found here. If they continue to vandalize, you can report them at WP:AIV where an admin can block them. --Hdt83 Chat 00:13, 8 September 2007 (UTC) Welcome to the Wikiproject! We have few rules or regulations, and even less formal organization. While much has been accomplished with New Jersey's communities, roads, schools, eelcted officials and more, there are always holes to be filled and articles to be expanded. If there is any avenue or area that you want to pursue, go for it. Feel free to approach me or the WP:NJ talk page with any questions, requests or guidance you might want. Alansohn 15:57, 11 September 2007 (UTC) How?How do I leave a message? This is all very, very confusing. I wanted to add William Wong to the Oakland CA Chinatow page as a notable living author and journalist. Someone wanted that to be deleted. What other information is needed to verify this person's autheticity? Book: Yellow Journalist: Dispatches from Asian American, 2001, Temple University Press ISBN 1-56639-830-4 Acadia Publishing: Images of America: Oakland's Chinatown, 2004 ISBN 0-7385-2925-7 Acadia Publishing: Images of America: Angel Island, 2006 ISBN 978-0-7385-4719-0 Website: Yellowjournalist.com Oaklandchinatownhistory.org There's more references, but what's needed? Joyce Mende Wong 21:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC) Wow. I think I'm not getting the help I need. What a shame to not have this person listed. Maybe someone else who understands all your directions will do it some day.Joyce Mende Wong —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joyce Mende Wong (talk • contribs) 21:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC) Re: QuestionUnfortunately, we cannot see removed speedy tagged content unless we've been viewing the csd page for a while and haven't purged anything, in which case it may still be there. Wizardman 12:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC) Notifying authors of pending speedy deletionsHello. Thanks for your help tagging things to be speedy deleted. Can I ask, though, that you let the authors know? The templates suggested on the speedy tag itself do a good job to let them know what's happening and what they can do about it. Thanks. WODUP 14:45, 12 September 2007 (UTC) Your NPWatcher applicationDear Endlessdan, Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher. WODUP 16:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC) AfD nomination of Mark BriggsAn article that you have been involved in editing, Mark Briggs, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Briggs. Thank you. Carlossuarez46 00:33, 13 September 2007 (UTC) I declined speedy on that one, after checking the Italian WP, this guy is some big star in Italy. Who knew? Anyway, I did a little tidying and yes, the article is in poor shape, but not a speedy candidate. Thanks for helping to keep WP clean. Carlossuarez46 00:41, 13 September 2007 (UTC) AfD nomination of Terri hollowellAn article that you have been involved in editing, Terri hollowell, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terri hollowell. Thank you. Carlossuarez46 00:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello there, Dan. I couldn't help but notice your multiple revisions to this article. Just a word of advice and that is to be careful of WP:3RR. I do not think what the author is doing could be considered vandalism, so I think you need to be careful. You might consider reporting the article/user to Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. I put a note on the talk page about the article's notability, because I don't think it satisfies WP:BIO, but I haven't nominated it for an AfD yet because I want to give the author time to establish its notability and cite some references. Anyway, this is just advice, not a warning. Cheers and happy editing to you. Into The Fray T/C 14:35, 13 September 2007 (UTC) Fair use disputed for Image:Hitz.jpgThanks for uploading Image:Hitz.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:13, 13 September 2007 (UTC) Fair use disputed for Image:Hitz1.jpgThanks for uploading Image:Hitz1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC) Fair use disputed for Image:Hitz3.jpgThanks for uploading Image:Hitz3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC) Fair use disputed for Image:Hitz5.jpgThanks for uploading Image:Hitz5.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:15, 13 September 2007 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hitz5.jpg)Thanks for uploading Image:Hitz5.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:26, 14 September 2007 (UTC) Jeff KunkelHi. I'm not Jeff Kunkel, just a big baseball fan. Why did you tag my article as being an autobiography? Can you please remove it? Thank you. Oddibe 13:55, 14 September 2007 (UTC) What —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyle panko (talk • contribs) 14:23, 14 September 2007 (UTC) Richard M.A. Knight 14:56, 14 September 2007 (UTC) I have argued the case for The Investor Relations Society to stay in the discussion page of the article. AwardOrphaned non-free media (Image:Hitz3.jpg)Thanks for uploading Image:Hitz3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:56, 17 September 2007 (UTC) Dear Endlessdan, my points are factual. I dont know who your fact checker is, but you should fire him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robocopper (talk • contribs) 17:33, 17 September 2007 (UTC) Vanity in AfD'sHi there. Just a note on AfDs: when discussing articles that have COI/autobio issues, please avoid the use of the word vanity. While it might be justified, it's sometimes inflammatory. Please see: WP:AFD#How_to_discuss_an_AfD. Cheers, --Bfigura (talk) 18:12, 17 September 2007 (UTC) toughsportsliveHey there: I'm resubmitting the entry made for tough sports live with several news references that I believe adds some legitimacy to posting information about this web-site and the content it produces. The content is not any different from the information posted on wikipedia for Bodog, another online entertainment company, or Girls Gone Wild. Personally, my only stake in this is that I am a subscriber to Tough Sports Live and I don't believe its fair for the United States government to regulate what people pay for on the Internet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Falvaz75 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 17 September 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for September 17th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:58, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Thanks!Cheers for the barnstar, it's my first in 2 years of editing. Thanks :D The KZA 23:19, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 20:19, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Thanks!Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page on Sep. 18th. It was apparently retaliation for my CSD nom on the vandal's article attacking a classmate or someone like that. -- Dethme0w 02:34, 24 September 2007 (UTC) I have removed the speedy delete tag you placed on this article, because there is a clear claim of notability in the article. If you still think the article should be deleted for whatever reason, please pursue the articles for deletion process. Natalie 19:40, 24 September 2007 (UTC) AfDI noticed that you started several AfDs for articles with a rationale proposing a merge. Please note that, although "merge" can be a result at an AfD discussion, it is not a valid reason for listing it at AfD. Please use {{merge}}, as explained at WP:MERGE, in the future. --Agüeybaná 22:46, 26 September 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for September 24th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 02:00, 27 September 2007 (UTC) Harlemacademyi was under the impression that on wiki student pages could be developed to research and create articles. We are attempting to create such a page for our elementary students to use, as they use wiki extensively in their classwork. As of now we have listed our mission and a general outline for what the site is to be used for, simply as a holding place until we can get our students on the site in the coming week(s). I know that I have encountered such wiki pages for schools in NY and MA. Can you please give me a concrete reason as to why our page has been flagged and what can be done to get in step with the wiki guidelines, as I have exhausted all options known to me. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Harlemacademy (talk • contribs) 19:39, 27 September 2007 (UTC) Dan, thanks for the update, I made a few edits on the page. I want to create a age that describes the school without being biased. When you get a moment, could you recheck (or anyone who may see this) and let me know what else may need to be done. We are not trying to use the site as a promotion, but rather as a tool for learning. Any more detailed assistance would be greatly appreciated! ```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Harlemacademy (talk • contribs) 02:12, 28 September 2007 (UTC) Disputed fair use rationale for Image:2sweetnwo.jpgThanks for uploading Image:2sweetnwo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shell babelfish 04:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC) Harlemacademy deletedan, i tried making edits, as well as sign up for an adoption. why was my page deleted before i could even be adopted? i want to conform our page to wiki standards, but a deletion within less than 24hrs when I was working to fix it seems a bit harsh. Can you please update me on why the deletion was done so fast? Harlemacademy 12:54, 28 September 2007 (UTC) Harlema Academythanks for all your help endlessdan! i hope we are not pestering you too much. i took your advice and contacted your adopter and posted my question at the help desk. Thanks again! Harlemacademy 14:04, 28 September 2007 (UTC) Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sexmusicalbum.gifThanks for uploading Image:Sexmusicalbum.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:36, 29 September 2007 (UTC) Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sf vs screen.gifThanks for uploading Image:Sf vs screen.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:43, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
|