User talk:DavFace

DavFace, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hey DavFace! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of tallest buildings in North America[edit]

Hey DavFace. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, List of tallest buildings in North America, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want List of tallest buildings in North America to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, AdamSmith12 (talk) 11:59, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Revel Atlantic City, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Toohool (talk) 17:55, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Revel Atlantic City. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Toohool (talk) 21:52, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have rode the elevator at Revel and there was a button for the 57th floor.

DavFace (talk) 22:05, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is based on reliable sources, not on the personal experiences of editors. If you find a reliable source that agrees with you, you can bring up on the article talk page (it would still need some discussion, since it would contradict other cited sources). A lot of buildings inflate their floor numbers to sound taller, it may be that sources have chosen to report the actual physical floor count instead. Toohool (talk) 22:58, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't stop rejecting what I write on Wikipedia, I'll block you. DavFace (talk) 23:46, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Chrysler Building replicas[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List of Chrysler Building replicas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 22:31, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Userpages[edit]

Please do not edit userpages that is not yours. It is considered disruptive. Qed237 (talk) 14:37, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Shore Club (Jersey City)[edit]

The article The Shore Club (Jersey City) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable building.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 22:37, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree. The Shore Club is a notable building with it's two towers the Shore North and the Shore South. Both towers have Emporis and Skyscrapercenter pages. Plus, when I last visited an open house in the Shore Club, I've collected information like that it has 3 Otis elevators, and the skipped floors. DavFace (talk) 23:49, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at One World Trade Center. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 02:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism, as you did at List of tallest buildings in Jersey City. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 02:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism, as you did at One World Trade Center. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 15:52, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at New York City, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Mlpearc (open channel) 14:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The James Monroe[edit]

FYI. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:56, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]