User talk:Amogus girl

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for contributing edits that were made in good faith, but have been deemed not to contribute positively to the article. These edits have thus been reverted. Wikipedia's page on unacceptable additions may explain why. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Help contents – the main help page.
Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to create your first article
Tutorial
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out the Teahouse, ask the Help Desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Once again, welcome! Schazjmd (talk) 16:58, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to WiMP, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please slow down and make sure your edits are constructive. I suggest asking questions at WP:TEA. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:28, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I highly suggest you slow down and read Wikipedia's policies before continuing. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:32, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because your username, ඞඞඞඞඞඞ, does not comply with Wikipedia's username policy. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy, which is summarized below.

Under Wikipedia's username policy, a username should represent an individual person. It should not: represent a group or organization; be promotional; be misleading (such as indicating possession of special user rights, being a "bot" account (unless approved), or implying that the account has any administrative or "moderator" user rights, or any kind of "power" or "authority" over other users); nor be offensive or otherwise disruptive. However, a username that contains the name of an organization and also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87" is allowed, but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company". Among others, the guidance on conflict of interest and the policy on paid-contribution disclosure are relevant.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change of your current account here. The new username that you choose must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
If you prefer to change the username of this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page here: {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If your username is not in violation of Wikipedia's username policy, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page here: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 18:52, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amogus girl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My username is not a violation of the username policy. I read the policy and it states that non latin characters are allowed. Because of that, I am requesting an unblock. ඞඞඞඞඞඞ (talk) 19:52, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are clearly using ඞ as an emoticon. Among Us is a great game but you can't use this for your username. Pick one that complies with WP:USERNAME. Yamla (talk) 19:54, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, I'm Rusalkii. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Laughter have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Rusalkii (talk) 04:18, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco. I noticed that you recently removed content from Uranus without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:56, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Laughter, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 07:07, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Manual of style. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Is there a reason you changed the redirect for Manual of Style? Making significant changes should be done carefully. There are several other redirect-related changes you've made that have been undone. I suggest slowing down and reading more about how Wikipedia works before you continue to make big changes. It's fine to be bold sometimes, but it's also important to be thoughtful. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:27, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at People, you may be blocked from editing. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:29, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Laughter. The hatnote on "Laughter" before your edit included many of the pages that redirect to "Laughter," including the candy bar. Your edit replaced all of them with only the candy bar. Removing "Giggle" and "Laugh" with just "Snickers" is worse and without consensus. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:33, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New username[edit]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Amogus girl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Amogus girl (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I want to change my username, I don't find it to be disruptive but it's for me to decide it's for the admins to decide ඞඞඞඞඞඞ (talk) 20:03, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'll give you a shot with this username. 331dot (talk) 20:14, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest a different username since names relating to "Among Us" and it's various memes are often used by trolls and vandals and it may end up with you being seen as such. If you still want that username then that's fine as long as an admin is ok with it. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:09, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Snicker edit[edit]

Hey, sorry for reverting your edit to Laughter earlier. I misread the template, everything there looks okay to me. Rusalkii (talk) 04:57, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Username[edit]

You are not allowed to remove content without explanation. Xx236 (talk) 07:40, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Changing redirect targets[edit]

Hi, when you change the target of a redirect (such as Sing), please check What links here and repair any wikilinks that need to go to the original redirect target and not the new one. Just letting you know for the future, I've cleaned up the links that previously went to sing -> singing. Schazjmd (talk) 22:53, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moving your userpage and your talk page[edit]

Hello, I've moved back your userpage and your talk page as they don't fit for article namespace. Sheep (talk • he/him) 23:42, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

-- Yamla (talk) 14:04, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amogus girl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wasn’t vandalizing, I wasn’t trying to ruin Wikipedia

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Now checkuser blocked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:30, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Amogus girl (talk) 14:16, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amogus girl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise I won’t ever do that again. I will no longer use multiple accounts. I am deeply sorry. Amogus girl (talk) 18:49, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's not how this works. Further evading your block will only make it harder to unblock you. You must return to your original account to request unblock- and there is zero chance of that happening without the standard offer period. 331dot (talk) 20:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will stop using all my accounts and start editing under a new account and then I will not make any more accounts