User talk:100.16.196.59

December 2023

Hello, I'm Chaotic Enby. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kinetoplastida have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ChaotıċEnby(t · c) 15:01, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kinetoplastida. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ChaotıċEnby(t · c) 15:02, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kinetoplastida, you may be blocked from editing. Please discuss any further change on the article's talk page or ask for a third opinion before introducing this change in wording again ChaotıċEnby(t · c) 15:06, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But Humans are not animals. 100.16.196.59 (talk) 15:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What are we, then? Plants? Fungi? Sar? Protists? Bacteria? ChaotıċEnby(t · c) 15:09, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In our own kingdom. 100.16.196.59 (talk) 15:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any reliable source talking about a "human kingdom" separate from the animal one? ChaotıċEnby(t · c) 15:13, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolution (4th nomination). ChaotıċEnby(t · c) 15:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Human–animal communication. ChaotıċEnby(t · c) 15:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2024

Hello, I'm Chaotic Enby. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Missile Command have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ChaotıċEnby(t · c) 23:13, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But Atari DID sue GCC for making Super Missile Attack. Anyways, I'll retool what I did to be accurate. 100.16.196.59 (talk) 23:17, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please add a reliable source for this kind of claim when adding it. ChaotıċEnby(t · c) 23:28, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Or maybe ASK someone to do so, I guess? 100.16.196.59 (talk) 23:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

...yes, that's exactly what I just did. (You're the someone) ChaotıċEnby(talk · contribs) 01:33, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Human–animal communication. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — Manticore 00:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Missile Command. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 02:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Missile Command. Materialscientist (talk) 02:02, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jacona. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Impossible Mission 2025—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jacona (talk) 22:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:09, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

February 2024

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ... discospinster _talk 23:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2024

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 17:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scramble up, baddie! You are scrambling up the wrong person! 100.16.196.59 (talk) 17:19, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

If I'm being honest, I get the sense that you may be too young to be editing Wikipedia anyway. Things such as consistent edit warring, editing quoted statements to not match the actual quotes, changing other people's talk messages, and trying to remove the word "butt" for being "offensive" speaks to not fully understanding basic wiki etiquette, and the fact you've continued to do all those things even after being warned by others and blocked multiple times suggests an inability or outright refusal to learn from your mistakes. If you do plan to start editing again once your block is up, I suggest you take this time to self-reflect on your behavior to understand why others were pushing back against you, and brush up on your editing basics to make it less likely that your edits will be reverted in the future, particularly the bits about citation and referencing. As the template says, you can also appeal your block if you can prove you understand why you were blocked in the first place and that you've learned and won't repeat the same behavior, though the block is likely to be upheld if you can't demonstrate a genuine understanding. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 17:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to do so, but this was the result of an oversight of my thoughts. NOW GET YOUR ACCOUNT BLOCKED AND YOU WILL BE SORRY! HA HA HA! 100.16.196.59 (talk) 17:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.