User talk:173.166.36.18

You have wrongly listed John Endecott as Massachusetts' second Governor.

The documentary evidence that supposedly made John Endecott Massachusetts' second Governor is a letter from the General Court in London to John Endecott in Salem adopted at an irregular session authorizing Endecott to govern Salem and Massachusetts. Massachusetts' Governor's Assistants were assigned various tasks such as investment/fund raising, recruiting settlers, and procuring ships and supplies. Governor's Assistant John Endecott's task, not title, was to govern Salem as Governor Matthew Craddock's proxy. That does NOT make John Endecott Massachusetts' second governor. It is likely that some influential members of the General Court objected to John Endecott's management/governing of Salem and the General Court irregular session was held to settle the matter. One week later, the General Court met in a regular session with Governor Craddock - not Endecott - as moderator to elect John Winthrop as Governor and re-elect John Endecott as a Governor's Assistant. See minutes of irregular and regular meetings in the records of the Massachusetts Bay Company/Colony's General Court.

Please remove John Endecott as Massachusetts' second Governor.

FYI. John Endecott was the Dorchester Colony's fourth and last governor after Roger Conant. John Endecott's Salem home (Washington and Church Street) was made from material prepared in England, shipped to Cape Anne, and moved to Naumkeag/Salem. As the Endecott House disappears when the Hooper/Hathaway Old Bakery appears, and the H/H Old Bakery's frame is mismatched (made from salvaged posts and beams), it is suspected that the H/H Old Bakery's frame is made with posts and beams salvaged from the Endecott House. The H/H Old Bakery is now on the grounds of the House of Seven Gables.

Mark Nystedt. marknystedt@yahoo.com.

August 2019

Hello, I'm Acroterion. I noticed that you recently removed content from Talk:Ilhan Omar without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Acroterion (talk) 17:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2019

Hello, I'm Dharmalion76. I noticed that you recently removed content from White Americans without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dharmalion76 (talk) 16:38, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to White Americans, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 16:40, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on White Americans; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ifnord (talk) 16:48, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:173.166.36.18 reported by User:EvergreenFir (Result: ). Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 16:51, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – bradv🍁 17:44, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

October 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at White Americans, you may be blocked from editing. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please kindly piss off with your Bias. I would love to know why Evergreenfir has not been censored for her continuous edit warring. Others would have been banned by now. Wikipedia has become an agenda provoked source of completely bias disinformation. It's unbelievable.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – bradv🍁 14:36, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Talkpage access revoked due to abuse. Acroterion (talk) 00:04, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Jacqui Irwin

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jacqui Irwin, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 17:43, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.