Jump to content

User talk:174.44.65.34

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What are you doing?

[edit]

Why are you re-pasting copyvio material? --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:03, 10 August 2017 (UTC) sorry 174.44.65.34 (talk) 18:05, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sockpuppetry (User:Manualy20, pretending to be someone else). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Floquenbeam (talk) 18:12, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Block Appeal

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

174.44.65.34 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I want to be unblocked and here are the reasons why i'm blocked from editing: I have been reverting an edit a blocked user did, and I was pretending to be someone else. Plus, I will no longer do sockpuppetry 174.44.65.34 (talk) 18:07, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not eligible for unblock consideration here. Make the request using your account. Yamla (talk) 18:10, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note that the person behind the User:Manualy20 account is blocked indefinitely, not just the account nor just this IP address. If this IP resumes editing when the 1 week block expires and appears to be the same person, the IP will be reblocked for block evasion, probably for a duration of 3-6 months. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:20, 11 August 2017 (UTC) @FLoquenbeam, I am not gonna make the same edits again Manualy20 did[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BSS Showbiz (September 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
» Shadowowl Marcos Rodriguez | t | SPI | AIV | Sandbox | Helpdesk » 17:21, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! 174.44.65.34, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! » Shadowowl Marcos Rodriguez | t | SPI | AIV | Sandbox | Helpdesk » 17:21, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Subtropical Depression one, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 174.44.65.34. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Subtropical Depression one".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 11:22, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bayesian regret has been accepted

[edit]
Bayesian regret, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:20, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]