User talk:176.111.204.250

Attention:

This IP address, 176.111.204.250, is registered to Bayonette AS (Norway). In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in the WHOIS report.

If you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time.

If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

August 2016[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please review WP:FRINGE and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. The content that you have recently inserted in an article was fringe material that was not reliably sourced. Neutrality^talk 19:32, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm WNYY98. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Oxytocin have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. WNYY98 (talk) 16:47, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rape during the Bosnian War. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jus da fax 23:53, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Rape during the Bosnian War, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 00:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your options[edit]

Regarding the Rape during the Bosnian War article, please review WP:3RR. If you keep reverting, you get blocked. May I suggest you now discuss the issue on the article talk page? I have started a new section at the bottom of that talk page and I submit to you this is a better choice. Jus da fax 00:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Prostitution in Iran. Valenciano (talk) 11:29, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:31, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 2015 San Bernardino attack has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: 2015 San Bernardino attack was changed by 176.111.204.250 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912653 on 2017-01-27T09:11:17+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017[edit]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Crime in Saudi Arabia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ImmernochEkelAlfred(Spam me! (or send me serious messages, whatever you like)) 19:54, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Toddy1. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Muawiyah I seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 11:59, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Toddy1. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Radovan Karadžić have been undone because they did not appear constructive. In particular:

The title of a newspaper article needs to be accurate, and you changed it from: Karadzic sentenced to 40 years for genocide to Karadzic sentenced to 40 year in prison for genocide.
Deleting the words Muslim and Muslims from sentences is unhelpful.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Toddy1 (talk) 11:59, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Pakistani general election, 2018 has been reverted.
Your edit here to Pakistani general election, 2018 was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://pbs.twimg.com/profile, https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/469352953451511808/pkOLJjPM.jpeg, https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/469352953451511808/pkOLJjPM.jpeg, https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/469352953451511808/pkOLJjPM.jpeg, https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/469352953451511808/pkOLJjPM.jpeg1) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:30, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Casualties of the Iraq War into American-led intervention in Iraq (2014–present). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:04, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Rape during the Bosnian War, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Maile (talk) 19:45, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

176.111.204.250 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

all above is lies, not true, someone is trying really hard to spread false information about the topics I pointed out, there are absolutely none, whatsoever, reliable sources to the accusation posted by the author or any third member regarding these topics. You should be ashamed of your self for spreading so much falsehood. I bet you live in a delusional world, that is why you post lies about things. The author of the page or the thirdparty add untrue statements which are nothing but fictitious, that is the reason I deleted the part of the post which was fictitious. But i realise now that it's not worth to edit anymore, because you just add back the lies again. God will judge you for this false accusations; would you have liked if i made a fictitious post of your mother or your daughter?

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. GAB^gab 00:36, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.