User talk:206.188.36.147

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 206.188.36.147, is registered to King County Library System and may be shared by multiple users using public terminals or a Wi-Fi hotspot, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock or Template:School block. Public terminals and Wi-Fi hotspots may have set expiry times (usually in 30- or 60-minute intervals); consider this in deciding a block duration. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation; network administrators may be able to disable access to the network by offenders.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

206.188.36.147 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock. This computer is one of hundreds or thousands that are part of the largest library system in the United States (according the Wikipedia article on this library system). In the alternative, create a new user for me. Call it HelpMe55 and a password of "passwordpassword". I will then change the password. Please do not send me through all these hoops. In the unlikely change that hackers see this before me, then I can ask again for account creation. Also unblock, thank you.

Decline reason:

As I said on the last IP's talk page where you requested an unblock, given that in the past few months this IP address has consistently been used only by the sock puppeteer (and now you), there doesn't seem to be many false positives here. If you aren't the person this block is meant for, you are welcome to request creation of an account. Since by now two IP addresses show no use whatosever except by you and the sock puppeteer, it seems increasingly likely that you are the person the block is meant for, though. Huon (talk) 20:18, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

206.188.36.147 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this is not true. I am not this other person. I have no interest in basketball. This other person, please call the police. Send him or her to jail. Then that is proof that I am not this person........edit: Oh, now I see! How clever. The administrators doing this are trying to get me so mad that I vandalize Wikipedia in anger for being blocked because of the library blockage. How sneaky!

Decline reason:

No. If you want to edit create an account.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:12, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing administrator: please refer to User talk:206.188.36.139. --JustBerry (talk) 20:33, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-endorsing note of recent revert ^{(revert by ThePlatypusofDoom (talk · contribs))}. --JustBerry (talk) 20:47, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dates on Standings

Hello! I am leaving the same message here as I left for User:107.0.12.249, however I am under the impression that you are the same user. Nevertheless, I see that you have undone a handful of my edits on a number of college basketball standings pages regarding the date. Per Template:CBB Standings End, the date listed on basketball standings indicated the last time the standings were changed (as in, no further than the date of the most recent game played). There are a couple reasons for this, including that forecasting dates should be avoided, and that it is possible for unexpected schedule changes (while generally rare) may potentially occur. Furthermore, if you are going to revert edits, you should do so by using the 'undo' feature, and also leave a comment with your reason. Please let me know if you have any questions. --Zachlp (talk) 14:10, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Still adding future dates. Please stop. — Wylie pedia 05:28, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then, I'll stop adding future dates then since you told me to stop it

December 2016

Hello, I'm JustBerry. I noticed that in this edit to Template:2016–17 Summit League women's basketball standings, you removed all the content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JustBerry (talk) 03:43, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is wild

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

206.188.36.147 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You have just blocked the largest library in the United States. Is this collective punishment? In some countries, if a villager does a crime, the army kills everyone in the village. Seems like this is what the Wikipedia Army did just that. Who is the Lt. Calley? I, hereby, condemn the village criminal. Please fix what Lt. Calley of Wikipedia did. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Feel free to create an account. It's your choice; blocking anonymous vandalism is hardly comparable to murdering innocent civilians. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 03:04, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

206.188.36.147 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So I'm blocked because I'm in a largest library system in the US? I thought I was not blocked but I'll wait until May 3rd until it will be unblocked

Decline reason:

"I'll wait until May 3rd" is not an unblock request. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:38, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2018

Your recent editing history at 2017–18 Tennessee Lady Volunteers basketball team shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Wylie pedia 02:49, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Samf4u. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Viacom— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Samf4u (talk) 18:41, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't do that for Viacom. Plus it had to make a mistake.

February 2018

Hello, I'm Retlawthethird. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lisa Lillien have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Retlawthethird (talk) 21:56, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lisa Lillien. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 19:44, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2018

Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Schneider's Bakery— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. —Non-Dropframe _talk 21:23, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.