User talk:2376453Z
June 2020[edit]
Hello, I'm DIYeditor. Your recent edit(s) to the page Terry A. Davis appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —DIYeditor (talk) 04:46, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
October 2020[edit]
Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to HIAG—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Isabelle 🔔 22:57, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Anti-Defamation League. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Anti-Defamation League, you may be blocked from editing. Philip Cross (talk) 12:45, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Clearly you are the disruptive element in question. Why do you feel compelled to repeatedly vandalize the ADL wiki by removing the word "Jew"? 2376453Z (talk) 12:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- No, adding "(Jew)" after someone's name borders on putting that name in Triple parentheses. Between that and deleting the lede for HIAG (as if the info there was wrong), consider this your final warning. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:36, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Great detective/phsychic work on your part. You should share your clairvoyant experiences on the telepathy wiki. Seriously though very creepy on your part to be attempting to extrapolate a motive for my wiki edits based on nothing apparently. Your sensitivity to my edits, however, is more telling than anything. 2376453Z (talk) 00:46, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Where did I say anything about motive? I pointed to publicly-recorded concrete actions of yours. That you read an insistence on motive into it is psychological projection on your part, and that you call it creepy suggests sensitivity on your part. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:32, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Don't take the truth so personally. Your little "final warning" cracked me up is all. 2376453Z (talk) 03:14, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Edit war at Nelson Agholor[edit]
You have been involved in an edit war at Nelson Agholor. Please discuss the matter on the talk page, and per WP:BLP and WP:BURDEN, you may not add the contested text until AFTER there is a consensus to re-add it. If you persist in reverting repeatedly to get your preferred text into the article, you may be blocked. --Jayron32 18:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
I opened a discussion on the talk page as requested. Anyone who objects to my edit may reply. 2376453Z (talk) 00:41, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- Stop adding this. You do not have consensus to add it. No-one responding does not mean that you have consensus to re-add it. You were already undone, don't start edit warring again.
- We do not discuss allegations of criminal acts that do not lead to convictions. In this case he was not even charged. Even if it were to go in the article it would not be something that would need to be in the lede, let alone in the first sentence. Stop pushing this. Meters (talk) 03:41, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
"We do not discuss allegations of criminal acts that do not lead to convictions." That's a very dubious statement. Based on that the only reasonable conclusion is that you're not an honest or trustworthy person. 2376453Z (talk) 03:54, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
August 2021[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nelson Agholor. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You have made this edit at least seven times now, including twice more after having been informed of edit warring by user:Jayron32. The fact that no-one responded to your talk page post does not mean that you have consensus to include this WP:BLP-violating material. You have been undone by five different editors, and no-one has supported you on the talkpage. You waited five months before raising the issue, so in all likelihood the earlier editors are not aware of your talk page post. Meters (talk) 03:58, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- This issue was raised at Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive325#Nelson_Agholor Meters (talk) 03:59, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 00:27, 23 August 2021 (UTC)If anyone wonders why this account is blocked, look up the page. Or look at the history of the Agholor article. Or at the history of Anti-Defamation League, with your admin glasses on, including that edit summary addressed to User:Philip Cross. 237etc., if you ever wish to ask to be unblocked, I'd read up on Wikipedia policies and guidelines, if only to figure out how many violations of how many policies you have committed. Drmies (talk) 00:30, 23 August 2021 (UTC)