User talk:2698632941q

This is 2698632941q's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rockin Rose (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rockin Rose and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rockin Rose, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:16, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2698632941q! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:16, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Since I’ve submitted several times of this topic never get approved. This topic artist is eligible for notable topic wiki as wiki one of requirement listing the notable artist needs to be a signed with major record label with 3 albums. Then this artist rockin rose is obviously meet the requirements people can check the truth via press ;google knowledge panel;or just via Spotify song credit;Apple Music album info;YouTube content info,I also see other artist on wiki they even provided Spotify song link and Apple Music album link as a reference and they get approved for wiki. Some of them are even not notable not signed with a major label as required. I also provided many press as references, also I found many major news websites such as China Net ease, Tencent News, 163.com; Phoenix China all recorded this topic Artist’s content. Please tell me Is the above press nets reliable enough? Thank you 2698632941q (talk) 21:24, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rockin Rose (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still fails WP:MUSICBIO, requires significant coverage in multiple independent relibale secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rockin Rose and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rockin Rose, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:55, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rockin Rose (March 9)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 22:07, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I noticed that in this edit to Draft:Nergard (band), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:06, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rockin Rose (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rockin Rose and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rockin Rose, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

VAXIDICAE💉 00:32, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rockin Rose (March 22)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Praxidicae was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

VAXIDICAE💉 18:07, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello 2698632941q. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Rockin Rose, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:2698632941q. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=2698632941q|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. – Joe (talk) 07:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

im not paid editing. no one paid me and i dont need anyone to pay me for editing anything.

Believe Digital

Please, do not reinsert promotional content on that page. Do not undo other users editions without minimum explanation. You can discuss this on the related talk page. CamiloCBranco (talk) 12:53, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That’s not promotional content . That’s press cited relevant article as evidence of current artists. These artists were signed to believe music either can be found on press;Spotify song credit;YouTube right content;record label detail. No matter these artists are big name or not very famous,they are signed to believe music that’s true. So stop deleting other users edition with your own opinion without researching those signed artist 2698632941q (talk) 14:01, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, 2698632941q. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Rockin Rose, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Netherzone (talk) 02:31, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi let me reply clearly 1:I’m not paid editing so no conflict 2: I’m not related to this page rockin rose or anyone, I’ve also edited other articles too. 3: I’m creating pages only for my own interests, we can contribute any legal contents to improve the Wikipedia pages, I put lot of attention on new musicians news and keep eye on it. New blood can give me more surprises. Anyway thank you for your attention and inquiry.

2698632941q (talk) 20:23, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide information about photographs you uploaded of Rockin Rose, that are "your work"? In particular this one:[1]. Netherzone (talk) 20:34, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I found the photo (file named rockin rose) from this artist's spotify About and took a screen shot.If it's offense to upload this artist's portrait,i would remove it.But i think this photo is on this musician's spotify page already,then it would be okay that i took screen shot and upload it to its wiki page.2698632941q (talk) 03:38, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 14:01, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2698632941q (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi MER-C,im not advertising nor self-promoting and not related to anyone.I've been edited wiki for almost 1 year,also been edited several wiki pages like creating their page,adding reference,bio,nominated article deletion and violation.Mostly people use spotify for online free streaming and itunes downloading so do i,i found this artist on spotify and apple music on some rock music playlists,realized this musician was signed to a major label and have millions of streams,so then i took a research and search its name on google found some news and google knowledge panel displaying its records label is Believe Digital also found the artist has been listed in a records label's website which is a sub label of The orchard-Sony.So i thought this artist is notable and sources are reliable and its notability is verifiable,so i created a wiki page for this artist and it's qualified for WP:GNG WP:NMUSIC Criteria for musicians and ensembles：Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable). As we know,Nobody can pay for news for self-promoting with fake contents nor fake to be a major records label's artist on any official digital streaming platforms,it is forbidden and not allowed by any major labels. I also see your discussion in AfD,but im blocked to edit,so these above words are what i wanna comment in that AfD RockinRose page too. Have a good day. 2698632941q (talk) 04:19, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you've edited articles(not "pages") for a year, it was with a different account or with an IP. As noted, you posted that the photos involved were your own work. Either they are your own work and you are indeed promoting and have an association with Rockin Rose, or you don't, but do not understand copyright and how it works on Wikipedia. Personally I think you are associated with them, but either option means that you should not be permitted to edit, and as such I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 06:53, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, 2698632941q, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Also, it is not permitted to edit while logged-out during a block. Netherzone (talk) 14:54, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]