User talk:47.20.177.163

Welcome to Wikiproject Medicine!

Here are some tutorials for further background.

Wikiproject Medicine video guide for new medical editors

Play the video on the left.

Happy editing! Zefr (talk) 02:11, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi 47.20.177.163! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Love of Corey (talk) 00:16, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to White chocolate, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. jp×g 04:07, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 01:53, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sundayclose (talk) 04:09, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Sourcing for ADHD

This edit was reverted as unconstructive because a) it introduces speculation about neurotransmitters and their effect on specific brain structures, and b) it was not sourced by a WP:MEDRS review. Such a statement requires a degree of certainty that - to my knowledge - doesn't eist in the medical review literature. --Zefr (talk) 02:10, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Alois Hitler, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. SpacetimeIsCool (talk ∙ contribs) 19:15, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your vision of drafts

Hello. Recently, you told me to “not create drafts for potential events”. You would be wrong on that. That is why it is a draft. We know the event will probably (and is) happening. If I had created it in article space, it would be ok for that comment of “don’t create articles for potential events”, which is true. But drafts can be used to create and gather info for potential events, especially when major things are happening related to them such as a state of emergency being declared. Elijahandskip (talk) 17:55, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Variants of SARS-CoV-2: interpretation of scientific results

Hi. In this table, you should know that 1% higher = 1.01 relative rate, and 1% lower = 0.99 relative rate. A relative rate of 1 means no change, so 0% higher/lower. So, a rate of 2.52 is 152% higher, not 252% higher. The reference, which is written in English by non-natives and is still in pre-print and is therefore not very reliable, actually uses language incorrectly when it uses both expressions interchangeably. When you changed Moderately to Moderate-to-significantly you are also not using English the scientific way. Significance in scientific articles refers to statistical significance. A significant difference means that a different value is probably different, whereas an insignificant difference is not that likely and may be actually be simply due to sampling noise. It is possible that two values are close enough to be different, and yet the difference is not statistically significant, that is, one cannot readily conclude they are really different. So "significantly higher" means "there is a high chance it is indeed higher", but it could be only a little higher, it does not necessarily imply "a lot higher". So "moderate but significant" in scientific sources means "there is a high chance it is indeed higher and we estimate it to be moderately higher". --Fernando Trebien (talk) 17:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ftrebien: Thanks for the clarification. Definitely am going to have to go a bit slower in amending the table in the future. 47.20.177.163 (talk) 16:20, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for reverting your edit.

I apologize for reverting this edit here (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muhammad_II_of_Khwarazm&oldid=prev&diff=1018547471). It was a mistake, and I apologize. --Incagnito (talk) 19:22, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, I'm Ytoyoda. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Anthony Bouchard, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Ytoyoda (talk) 18:44, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

While he did admit to intercourse with a minor, we cannot assign a specific crime without charges or conviction. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:46, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Variants of SARS-CoV-2, did not appear constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. does not seem like a conducive edit for the article Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:56, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Dragon Man

Hello, there is a new discussion that you may wish to participate in. Blockhouse321 (talk) 13:25, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Dragon Man (archaic human), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Ashley yoursmile! 18:11, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ashleyyoursmile, It was a cut-and-paste page move attempting to close a move discussion at that article's Talk page. I am currently not inclined to evaluate the current consensus on the discussion at this time. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:13, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

JalenFolf, thank you for letting me know. I'll leave it for another admin to evaluate the consensus and close the discussion. Ashley yoursmile! 18:15, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

IP, please see WP:PNSD. It's not just the amount of supports and opposes that matter; it's the strength of the reasoning as well. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:56, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Taliban offensive

Hi, I reverted your edit about district numbers because it lacked a citation. I see now that you've added a citation, it is still incorrect as the citation gives the number of Taliban controlled districts in Afghanistan, not the number of districts captured in this offensive. With regards to other parts of my edit they were an update as my edit summary said. I see that you are new editor and are assuming good faith in your edits. I advise you to do the same during your interaction with other editors before accusing them of giving false edit summaries. Viewsridge (talk) 18:47, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Viewsridge: Noted. Will change the wording so that it clarifies that the Taliban CONTROL the district number and have not actually captured them. 47.20.177.163 (talk) 18:50, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗸 18:53, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to List of heat waves, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:53, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Cong you bing, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 09:26, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ENGVAR

Hello, thank you for your contributions. I noticed that you changed the variety of English from British English to American English in the article, Bactria–Margiana Archaeological Complex. The article was written in British English, and had a clearly visible template in the main editing window that specified that the article was in EngvarB since 2016. The encyclopedia is written by international editors, who use many variants of English, including American, British, Canadian, India, Australian, Pakistani, etc. Please read WP:ENGVAR for more information. In general, if the original article was was written in a specific variant, we leave it that way. Also sometimes, altho not always, if an article is on a subject of a particular English speaking country, we honor that variant. Personally, I wish more editors would tag the talk pages with the variant they use when creating an article, but that does not happen that frequently. I will go ahead and do that on the Bactria article so you can see the template I add. Netherzone (talk) 00:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rabi' al-Awwal, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. InvadingInvader (talk) 21:22, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rabi' al-Awwal, you may be blocked from editing. F Adesdae 378 00:37, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rabi' al-Awwal. F Adesdae 378 00:40, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Rabi' al-Awwal shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Toddst1 (talk) 18:24, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2022

Hello, I'm Pizzaplayer219. I noticed that you recently removed content from Casabona without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 13:22, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. GabberFlasted (talk) 14:57, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 years for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Zhomron per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zhomron. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 00:45, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.