User talk:65.87.149.76

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (65.87.149.76) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Musdan77 (talk) 05:53, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm Musdan77. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Musdan77 (talk) 06:34, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Darkmaster2004. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks. Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please, only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! Melody Concerto^talk 22:33, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Darkmaster2004. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from 1630 in music. Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please, only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. 2nd notice. Melody Concerto^talk 18:18, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1866 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[April 4]] – William Dick], founder of [[Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies|Edinburgh Veterinary College]] (b. [[1793]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:13, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1074 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

the [[Tengizi Islands]], and becomes the first king of the [[Kingdom of Tengiz]].|date=March 2012}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:03, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Geraldo Perez. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from 2012 in American television. Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please, only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:20, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Hello! Please be a bit more discriminate in your addition/removal of links and the piped links. There is WP:OVERLINKING on the one hand, with common terms that don't really need to be explained, and there is the need to pipe some links on the other, because "Middle Ages Europe" is poor English compared to "medieval Europe". Cheers, Constantine ✍ 14:08, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2012 in American television, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:33, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at 2011 in American television, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:21, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 908 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Li Keyong]], [[Shatuo Turks] who laid the foundation for the [[Later Tang]] in [[China]] (b. [[856]])

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:22, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1970 in film may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* January 29 - [[Heather Graham]]], actress

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:35, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

removing / changing links

why are you removing / changing links? you're leaving a lot of grammatical errors — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.114.11.16 (talk) 21:54, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

While some of your edits were beneficial, I have blocked you because you were just as likely to introduce new errors as you were to fix them. See for example these edits: [1][2][3][4][5]... To me this looks like a semi-automated tool that acts according to some pre-set parameters without a true understanding of what it does. If you think this block is in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} . Huon (talk) 22:32, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed some content from 1949 in television without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Denisarona (talk) 18:24, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 1946 in television, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Daniel298289 (talk) 23:39, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 1971 in television, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Musdan77 (talk) 16:06, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your aversion to piped links

You have made a number of edit to year-related articles, in which you get rid of piped links. Unfortunately, the vast majority of those edits were highly problematic – witness this one, which left the article with the sentence "The Roman Empire war against Numidia and Mauretania ends with their annexation". This is just plain grammatically wrong, as were most of the others. I have therefore taken the drastic step to bulk revert your changes to the year articles, and I strongly recommend that you not resume this practice. Favonian (talk) 17:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, I'm Thesixthstaff. I noticed that you recently removed some content from 1916 in film without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Redlinks that link to non-notable subjects can be deleted, but often redlinks help Wikipedians see what pages need to be created. Thesixthstaff (talk) 14:11, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 1987 in American television, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Musdan77 (talk) 04:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.